Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 22, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_________________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 8 of 19 <br /> <br />(4. #10-3442 THE EMILY PROGRAM, 2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br /> <br />rehab facility for the mentally ill. Printup stated the residents do not pay premium taxes to live in the beauty <br />and somewhat rural charm of Orono to have that as a neighbor. <br /> <br />Printup noted that a police call to that facility will cost the community and taxpayers. If the neighbors notice <br />a high volume of traffic, there is nothing they can do about it. The permit stays with the property. When <br />someone gets hurt or is running down the street trying to run away or is found in the park having made a poor <br />choice, there is nothing the neighbors can do to make the program leave. There is a very likely possibility, if <br />the eating disorder aspect does not work out, and because that disorder is a mental illness, that then paves the <br />way for other mental health patients to move in, which is state law. Many times people with mental health <br />issues are also cigarette smokers. Printup indicated he does not want his child to be around or see people who <br />smoke. <br /> <br />Printup asked if anyone on the Council has any interest or background in this program. Every council member <br />he has spoken to by phone has stated the same two reasons for why they support the program. The reasons <br />given were that building vacancy is bad and helping people is good. It was also quoted in the newspaper about <br />what‟s not to like about this program. Printup stated when he asked the mayor this question, he was given two <br />reasons: building vacancy is bad and helping people is good. Printup comments that that seems to be a <br />common theme or line to support it. <br /> <br />Printup stated he has heard more valid public safety reasons not to support it and that he would like to keep <br />Orono rural in character. Printup requested the City Council delay any approval vote tonight or in the very <br />near future because a lot more thought and consideration needs to go into this application. Printup requested <br />the City Council not take the approach of “I know what‟s best for you,” because we live here, we know best, <br />and those are the two reasons why you should oppose this program from operating in Orono. <br /> <br />Steve Byrnes, 1025 Heritage Lane, noted that he does have a connection to the Emily Program. Byrnes stated <br />he has never met Dr. Miller, but he would like to say thank you to him for saving his sister‟s life, who suffered <br />from an eating disorder. <br /> <br />Byrnes commented that it is time some of the residents speak in favor and support of The Emily Program. <br />Byrnes indicated he has been a resident of Orono his entire adult life and that he is surprised at the reaction of <br />some of his neighbors. The residents here live in a wonderful city, with a number of resources. This is an <br />opportunity to help others. Byrnes stated simply because you suffer from an eating disorder does not mean <br />that you are mentally ill. The people who seek help for an eating disorder is because they want help and not <br />because they are court ordered. <br /> <br />Byrnes noted he does have some concerns as well. He has two small boys who like to play in the park, walk to <br />the post office, and run on the trail. Byrnes stated the provisions he has heard from Dr. Miller and the fact that <br />they are willing to surrender the CUP is good enough for him and that this is a wonderful opportunity to help <br />our neighbors and other people out. <br /> <br />Mike Maddie, 2150 Prospect Avenue, stated following the first City Council meeting, he wanted to learn some <br />more facts about The Emily Program. He did make a visit to one of the facilities because he had some <br />concerns due to his lack of knowledge about the program. One of the major concerns is what due diligence <br />has been done by the City and Staff as it relates to this application and the fact that all of the information on <br />the program has come from the applicant. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 03/08/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 02/22/2010 <br />[Page 8 of 19]