My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
02-23-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2012 9:57:32 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 9:57:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 <br /> • (#2561 Frank and Barbara Peterson, Continued) <br /> property, which would allow her to eliminate the need for a small storage shed. Peterson stated the <br /> City should look at whether they are creating another problem by limiting structural coverage to the <br /> 15 percent. Peterson commented in her view property owners are forced to store cars and other <br /> personal property outside or in small, unsightly storage sheds, which is very detracting to the <br /> appearance of the neighborhood and appears to be a growing problem. <br /> Smith inquired whether the Planning Commission has ever approved structural coverage in excess <br /> of 15 percent on any other applications. <br /> Hawn stated the City does allow Applicants to replace what is existing. Hawn noted this garage <br /> would be considered new construction. <br /> Kluth stated he would not be opposed to considering Minnesota winters a hardship. <br /> Gaffron stated the City prior to 1983 granted variances to hardcover with minimal discussion if the <br /> property exceeded the allowable limit. The City Council, starting in 1984, realized that excessive <br /> hardcover was getting out of hand and started to enforce the limits. Over the years the City has <br /> gotten stricter on hardcover and structural coverage. <br /> Hawn inquired whether the Planning Commission would be in favor of building an accessory building <br /> which exceeds the height of the principal structure. <br /> Peterson stated this garage would be used to store vehicles, snow blower and lawn mower. <br /> Hawn inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this application. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Kluth inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to compromise on the size of the garage. <br /> Peterson stated she would like to build the garage as proposed. <br /> Kluth moved to recommend denial of Application #2561, Frank and Barbara Peterson, <br /> 1261 Arbor Street, unless the proposed garage is reduced in size to comply with the <br /> 15 percent structural coverage limit. NO SECOND. <br /> Hawn inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to construct a garage which will comply with <br /> the 15 percent structural coverage limit. <br /> Peterson stated her husband probably will not be agreeable to limiting it to the 15 percent and will <br /> erect a shed to accommodate their other personal items. Peterson stated rather than deny the <br /> application, she would be agreeable to limiting the structural coverage to 15 percent. <br /> Kluth moved, Nygard seconded,to recommend approval of Application #2561, Frank and <br /> Barbara Peterson, to permit the construction of a garage not to exceed the allowed <br /> 15 percent total structural coverage on the lot, and to grant variances to side yard setback, <br /> lot coverage and location of the garage doors. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.