Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 2000 <br /> • <br /> (#2558 Anthony Patterson, Continued) <br /> Hawn commented the Planning Commission is reluctant to approve structural coverage <br /> which exceeds the allowable 15 percent. <br /> Kluth stated he does not have a problem with the proposed setbacks. Kluth stated the <br /> concrete sidewalk would be considered hardcover. Kluth stated if the deck is reduced by <br /> ten square feet, structural coverage would be reduced to 18.2 percent, which is the <br /> existing amount of structural coverage on the property. <br /> Smith suggested the Applicants keep the structural coverage at the existing limit, noting <br /> the code allows up to 15 percent structural coverage. <br /> Hawn suggested the Applicants revise their plan in an effort to reduce the overall structural <br /> coverage on the property. <br /> Smith noted City Staff is recommending reconfiguration of the lakeside deck and keeping it <br /> at its present size, which will eliminate the need for a hardcover variance and encroachment <br /> into the 0-75'setback area. <br /> Bergman inquired whether patio stones are considered hardcover. <br /> Smith stated they would be counted as hardcover. Smith inquired whether the Applicants <br /> would like their application tabled to allow them time to revise their plan. <br /> • Kluth noted the sideyard is grandfathered in. Kluth recommended this application be <br /> tabled. <br /> Patterson inquired whether the application could proceed forward if they keep the hardcover <br /> and structural coverage at the existing limits. <br /> Hawn stated the Planning Commission needs to review the revised plan before approving <br /> it. Hawn stated she would not be comfortable approving this application prior to seeing <br /> a revised plan. <br /> Smith indicated she was in agreement with Hawn and that the Planning Commission really <br /> needs to review the revised plan to see exactly what is being proposed before approval is <br /> given. <br /> Hawn advised the Applicant to have the application tabled. <br /> Patterson requested the application be tabled. <br /> Smith moved, Kluth seconded, to table Application #2558, Anthony Patterson, <br /> 1780 Shadywood Road, to allow the Applicant time to submit a revised plan. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> • <br /> Page 32 <br />