Laserfiche WebLink
�l � T �r vK�rv� � olc4f�V� lu Vb/Cl /yb IU:�y � :U4/ IU NU: IyS <br /> a nonbuildable lot (no primary Stncture) . " The planning <br /> commission denied respondents' proposal and the city council pas9ed <br /> a resolution citing the following :easons for denial : . <br /> (A? The lac�k�ualtre ponaible�for protecting thehd�ck nor <br /> 1 s no indi i <br /> the boats maintained ac �hat dock. <br /> (B) An adjacekt iocatedronTTra�tsgn) already has a dock <br /> [Ghe 1960 doc ] <br /> (�) The property ie not wide enough to provide adeguate <br /> pazking. * � * <br /> (D) Approval of the u9e of an acceasory structure such as <br /> a dock, W1re°edenti n dealing withtar imilar requ ata�for <br /> negative p <br /> lots of similar size . <br /> Respondents later sent a memo co the city council , outlining <br /> the conc�rns the city council expressed and suggestir.g a different <br /> pzoposal that they thought would eatiefy tho�� concerns . <br /> Respondente proposed conveying some property to Tillotson to <br /> provide him legal access to the lake, and building a eingle common <br /> do�k to be sha=ed by Tillotson, Pcterson, and SLodola. <br /> At a city council meeting, the council denied the ehared dock <br /> proposal . At a later meeting, the council adopced a resolution <br /> denying the shared dock proposal . The resolution i�ndicated that : <br /> Council refused to accept the interpretation <br /> of zhe accessoxy C n�geb�seduon the following <br /> propoeed by app <br /> findings : <br /> (A) The City haa never credited a preliminazy <br /> etrucCure on an adjacent property to allow <br /> accasaory uses or etructures on lots that did <br /> not suscain principal re9idences . <br /> {B) The credit of the principal residence for� <br /> ' � ' an acceaeory use/etructure- serving an adj acent <br /> proper,ty w.il�. establish a negative precedent <br /> -3- <br />