Laserfiche WebLink
i i <br /> Melanie Curtis <br /> From: Melanie Curtis <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 4:45 PM <br /> To: 'Randy Hobbs' <br /> Cc: 'WP&D Administration'; 'bbrueggeman@earthlink.neY; 'info@edsmn.com'; Jesse Struve <br /> Subject: RE: 325 Crestview#2012-01098 <br /> Randy <br /> Our engineer had to unexpectedly leave the office today but before he left I pried some verbal comments out of him on <br /> your revised survey (received today). He indicated that the drainage arrows on the northeast portion of the lot are <br /> pointing incorrectly (up hill) and should be corrected. Also, regarding the retaining walls shown on the plan on the <br /> western side of the lot"to be removed and reinstalled as needed" if the walls are to exceed 4' in height or if tiered <br /> retaining walls are not separated by 2x the height of the wall they will need to be reviewed and signed off by a registered <br /> professional engineer. <br /> Please provide a revised survey correcting the drainage arrows. I can accept digital copies if they contain a digital <br /> signature by the surveyor. Additionally, our building official was out all day today at a class so he has not had a chance <br /> to review the revised building plan information. <br /> Melanie <br /> Melanie Curtis � 952.249.4627 � mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us <br /> From: Melanie Curtis <br /> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 3:43 PM <br /> To: Randy Hobbs <br /> Cc: 'WP&D Administration'; bbrueggeman@earthlink.net; 'info@edsmn.com' <br /> Subject: 325 Crestview #2012-01098 <br /> Comments from our city engineer are below on 325 Crestview(survey dated November 26): <br /> 1. The survey shows a lot of existing items such as a pool, driveway, and multiple retaining walls. What of these <br /> items will remain in place? It would be my opinion, at least the retaining walls would need to be removed and <br /> reinstalled to construct the new home. Please clarify what existing items will be removed and what will remain <br /> in place. <br /> 2. The survey does not show proposed contours. <br /> 3. The existing driveway will be required to be removed as double access points are not allowed. <br /> 4. The proposed driveway is too wide at the road. City Code only allows for a 20' wide access. <br /> 5. Need to show erosion control around the property. <br /> Please address the comments and submit a revised survey for our continued review. Additionally the hardcover should be <br /> calculated using the City's forms (attached). <br /> Melanie <br /> Melanie Curtis <br /> Planning &Zoning Coordinator <br /> City of Orono <br /> 2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> Orono, MN 55356 <br /> Direct Dial: 952.249.4627 <br /> Fax: 952.249.4616 <br /> 1 <br />