My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2185
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2100 - 2199 (December 8, 1986 - June 8, 1987)
>
Resolution 2185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2016 2:53:21 PM
Creation date
4/28/2016 2:53:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> �� clt o� oR,oNo <br /> • � <br /> � <br /> ` � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ,� NO. 2185 <br /> '��j'� ) The applicant proposes to remove 165 s.f. of <br /> � � � xisting hardcover in the 75-250' zone to compensate <br /> for the 165 s.f. of additional hardcover to be created <br /> as a result of the proposed addition. This will result <br /> in no net increase in hardcover over the 28.57 � <br /> hardcover existing in the 75-250' zone. <br /> � c) The proposed addition will connect the house with <br /> . the existing detached garage which is located 6.7' from <br /> ��r the side lot line. The Planning Commission finds that <br /> the side setback variance is appropriate only because <br /> of the location of the existing garage, the substandard <br /> side setback of which resulted from an error in the <br /> previous owner's determination of the location of the <br /> property boundary. • <br /> d) The partially finished room over the garage when <br /> constructed was never intended for use as human living <br /> quarters as evidenced by the previous owner's written <br /> statement, hence in conjunction with the side setback <br /> variance it is appropriate to place the condition that <br /> _the garage may not be fitted with plumbing, nor may it <br /> • be used as human living quarters. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application <br /> . including the findings and recommendations of, the Planning <br /> Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant <br /> and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, <br /> safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Counci 1 f inds that the conditions existing on <br /> this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally <br /> to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> � variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br /> light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to allevi:ate <br /> a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to pre- <br /> serve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br /> would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br /> Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> • , <br /> . __ _ __ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.