My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
12-09-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:10 PM
Creation date
2/9/2012 1:03:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — DECEMBER 9, 1991 <br />1992 CONTRACTS WITH LONG LAKE — CONT. <br />Sullivan noted that in negotiations prior to the authorization to <br />hire additional personnel, Long Lake had reduced their request <br />for additional manpower. He noted at that time they,asked the <br />price for less -personnel there was no contract in effect, <br />therefore making it fair game to renegotiate the amount of <br />additional personnel. He stated at the Long Lake Council meeting, <br />Long Lake asked him if he would seek to do things as cost <br />effective as possible, and he indicated to them he would. Long <br />Lake also asked if additional manpower and time was required, <br />would Orono notify them prior to the service, and he indicated he <br />would do that. <br />Jabbour noted the Long Lake budget is tight, as is everyone's, <br />and he just wants to make sure that Long Lake will be able to.pay <br />its portion for service. <br />Sullivan felt it would be beneficial to have :multi —year <br />contracts. <br />Callahan noted the previous year's contract provided that after <br />the expiration of the contract, Long Lake would pay extraordinary <br />costs whether or not they terminated. The current.. contract <br />provides that Long Lake pay only if they terminate. He_ stated <br />that the City of Orono has incurred these extra costs because of <br />the contract, and he felt Long Lake should pay no matter who <br />terminates the contract. <br />Moorse indicated he thought the language had been changed and <br />will review the contract again. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt the <br />contract with the appropriate amendments, as discussed at <br />previously during the meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />( *##21) CITY ADMINISTRATOR VACATION REQUEST <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to allow the City <br />Administrator, Ron Moorse, to take vacation the afternoon of <br />Tuesday, December 24th and on Thursday, December 26 and Friday, <br />December 27th. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(##22) SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO COUNTY ROAD 15 — RESOLUTION ##3059 <br />Goetten wanted to know what type of improvements are proposed. <br />Butler explained the County-is going to do a "feasibility study to <br />consider the upgrade of the existing roadbed, and the road .will <br />t only end up wider in areas where turn lanes are necessary. <br />g Goetten noted that the County Road currently crosses her"property <br />and she will never allow for further expansion of the roadbed. 'v <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.