Laserfiche WebLink
MINUT99 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — DECEMBER 90 1991 <br />(##20) 1992 CONTRACTS WITH LONG LAKE <br />Callahan noted the former contract allowed for a termination <br />notice which had to be given by October 1. He noted the new <br />contract allows the contract to run from January through <br />December, and does not allow ample time for the other party to <br />regroup in the event of termination. <br />Jabbour felt notice of termination should be given prior to the <br />adoption of the next year budget. <br />Moorse explained this contract is only an interim contract, with <br />the assumption that there'will be many changes made to the 1 <br />contract for 1993. <br />Butler suggested that "whereas, the contract for 1993 shall °be <br />agreed upon no later than October 1, 1992 ", be added•. She asked <br />Sullivan about a conversation that he had with the Long Lake <br />Council regarding the price 'for police coverage, and the fact <br />that they are already short funds for 1992. <br />Sullivan explained that Long Lake had arbitrarily designated <br />$220,000 in the preliminary budget for police service, which <br />allowed between 1 1/2 to 2 additional persons. He tried to have <br />them conceptualize 2 persons rather than the 1 1/2. He noted one <br />Council member suggested they transfer money from the legal fund <br />to the police fund, which resulted in a 2 -2 vote. He explained <br />they decided to stay with the original figure with the <br />understanding that they would receive 40 hours a week- for the <br />first few months, and starting around March ist, they would be <br />allocated 80 hours additional .a week. <br />Butler reiterated that she wanted the price of the contract known <br />up front, and wanted it known that Long Lake has set its -budget <br />lower than the contract price. <br />Sullivan noted that there was a lack of communication in the <br />previous year. He'noted the coverage was changed during the year <br />to reflect the price Long Lake was paying. <br />Jabbour stated that because of newspaper coverage, the citizens <br />believed there was a dispute between the two cities because of a <br />$5,000 bill, which he noted is not a major issue to him. He <br />noted his major concern is how the City can run efficiently based <br />on contract cities decisions. He.noted that Long Lake was to <br />budget for 2 '1/2 additional persons for 1992, consequently the <br />Council approved hiring of additional personnel._ He noted now <br />Long Lake is below even 2 additional persons. <br />15 <br />