Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> #2398 Wayzata Country Club <br /> August 19, 1998 <br /> Page 4 <br /> is lacking, the Council should only act on the tee and bunker concept plan at this <br /> time,and keep the current application open for the time being until the additional data <br /> is provided for the ponds. This will allow the tee and bunker projects scheduled for <br /> this fall to proceed without delay. <br /> DNR Comments <br /> Please review the attached letter from Martha Reger of the DNR regarding potential boundary <br /> conflicts that need to be avoided. <br /> Planning Commission Recommendation <br /> Planning Commission reviewed this item at their August 17 meeting. No members of the public had <br /> any comments. Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the tee and bunker <br /> program as proposed, but recommended that a recommendation on the pond expansions be delayed <br /> until more detail has been provided. Planning Commission did not feel that a minimum property <br /> line setback for tees be established, other than adherence to the City's 5' setback for any site grading. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit to approve the concept plan for the tee and <br /> bunker program as submitted, with the conditions outlined above. The proposed pond expansions <br /> are specifically not approved in the attached resolution, and will require that additional engineering <br /> detail be submitted for staff and Planning Commission review under the current application. The <br /> merits of each pond expansion project must be taken into account once the required detail plans are <br /> submitted, and other agencies may require permits for this work. <br /> COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br /> 1. Adopt the attached resolution granting master plan approval for the reconstruction of tees and <br /> bunkers atWayzata Country Club, which will allow them to obtain the required land alteration <br /> permits for the tee/bunker work proposed far 1998. <br /> 2. Advise the applicant that the proposed pond expansions appear to be appropriate in concept <br /> but will not be considered for approval until the required detailed engineering work has been <br /> submitted, and reviewed by staff and the Planning Commission. <br />