Resolution 2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' � , � ' ' ' . . ., • . � � � L� � C�t o� ORONO � � t ,T�yy�, i�.•: �- • �. . • ��. �} l� r � '; � RESOLUTION OF�THE CITY COUNCIL - --- -- -� � �° • ` t. NO. 2004 . � . �. � • - • • _„ �. � •;� ....:, '; 8. At that same meeting the Orono City Council directed staff to =.,s prepare a resolution of approval for Applications 991 and 1018 iA and to� include the following findings in that resolution: i- • A) The alterations proposed in the lagoon area (Area 1) ` � involved no major changes in elevations or in local = drainage. This type of filling is typical where new ground cover is to be installed. Applicant maintained adequate erosion control thoughout entire restoration. � ' B) The alterations proposed within 75 feet of the lake to permit the installation of the foundation ground water , , drainfield as proposed in plan by Mark S. Gronberg referred to as Drain Ti le Detai ls (Area 2 ) and as amended by Glenn . Cooksreport dated June 2, 1986 is found to be superior to �• drainage allowed to surface on ground to collect sediment, fertilizers and other debris. � C) The berming along Bohn's Point Road right-of-way (Area � 3) as approved by Council will be consistent with the height � of all allowed man-made improvements along the street lot " . line of lakeshore 1-ots adjacent to minor thoroughfares and . such improvement would be consistent with the intent and guidelines for all development within lakeshore residential , -. districts. . D) The filling within the corridor along the shared lot , line of the property (Area 4 ) provides more uniform or . � f latter grades providing a more suitable treatment area for ; surface drainage rather than the more extreme elevations � approved at the time the building permit was approved. The � east 1/3 of the property now drains to a pond before ' entering the main lake. 9. The City Counci l�'f inds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; . _ would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is � necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. � Page 3 of 6