Laserfiche WebLink
♦ .f.� � � • . • � <br /> � ' �` Cit o� ORONO <br /> , 3' . . . <br /> � • �=�r .��;r�:: <br /> _ t��' �`,��., <br /> i�� <br /> • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `' NO. 2004 <br /> � .kt' <br /> . •'� • • , <br /> . ' Area 2 - Two trenches 2 feet wide have been constructed from <br /> � the foundation at approximately the 933 elevation and extend <br /> to within 75 feet of the lake. The trenchs consist of PVC <br /> ' pipe surrounded with crushed rock with a silt fabric barrier <br /> over gravel. Applicant wishes to discharge underground <br /> -. drainage into the lake. <br /> Area 3 - Applicant proposes 6 feet high berms along the <br /> ' street lot line of the property. <br /> Y <br /> Area 4 - Applicant has placed from 4' to 8' of fill within a <br /> . 100' by 360' corridor located along the shared lot line of <br /> Lots 1 & 2 Lydiard's Park. <br /> 6. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> April 21, 1986, and recommended approval of the after-the-fact <br /> variances for land alterations performed within 75 feet of the � <br /> ' . lake and for the proposed installation of a ground water drain- <br /> • field placed 10 feet from the shoreline per Municpal Zoning Code <br /> Section 10.21, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and <br /> recommended approval of certain after the fact and proposed <br /> conditional use permits to permit the fill to remain along the <br /> • shoreline (Area 1) and along the shared lot line (Area 4) and to <br /> " install a foundation ground water drainfield (Area 2) and denied <br /> � applicant's request to berm along the street lot line of Lot 2 <br /> . Lydiard's Park (Area 3) based on the following findings: <br /> . A) The 6 feet high berms are not compatible with <br /> �. surrounding neighborhood. The property is located off a <br /> limited use road that serves an old established lakeshore <br /> neighborhood on a small peninsula. <br /> • B) The six feet berms would destroy the natural open yard <br /> appearance and ambiance of this neighborhood. <br /> C) The use or locating of solid, privacy walls or fences on <br /> lakeshore lots is limited because the intent and standards <br /> of Orono's code is to preserve the view of the lake for all <br /> lakeshore property owners. ' <br /> D) The applicant has failed to demonstrate the need for <br /> screening from noise or lights and has only stated that �the <br /> berms would provide privacy. <br /> � 7. The Orono Council at their meeting of May 12 , 1986 <br /> conceptually adopted the Planning Commission recommendation and <br /> in addition advised the applicant that 3 1/2 foot berms would be <br /> permitted along the street lot line (Area 3) finding such <br /> improvement compatible with the intent and purpose of the <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Chapter as set forth in Section 10.01. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />