My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-00728 (new structure)
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Circle
>
3227 Casco Circle - 20-117-23-43-0056
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2013-00728 (new structure)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:01:40 PM
Creation date
2/26/2016 3:38:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3227
Street Name
Casco
Street Type
Circle
Address
3227 Casco Circle
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
2011723430056
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� Jesse Struve <br /> From: Jesse Struve <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 1:35 PM <br /> To: Melanie Curtis <br /> Cc: Christine Mattson <br /> Subject: 20130912 3227 Casco Cir#13-00728 <br /> Melanie, <br /> I have reviewed the proposed survey for the new house at 3227 Casco Circle and have the following concerns: <br /> 1. From our conversation,the applicant is not doing any of the work shown in the 0-75' zone with the exception of <br /> installing the proposed drainage pipes. All other work not being proposed with this application needs to be <br /> removed from the survey. This includes removing the existing retaining wall and all work associated with the <br /> boathouse. <br /> 2. The survey shows a piped outfall from the low spot which discharges partially down the slope. This discharge <br /> does not show any erosion control measures to prevent erosion of the slope to the lake. Something will need to <br /> be installed down the slope probably all the way to the lake to prevent erosion. This may also need to be <br /> shielded from the lake. <br /> 3. There should be treatment of the runoff prior to entering the pipe. I would recommend a rain garden be <br /> installed which can handle the volume of runoff associated with at least a 10 yr event prior to water being <br /> directed into the pipe. <br /> 4. The engineer should provide modeling results of this low area which shows if back to back 100 yr rain events or <br /> a 100 yr snowmelt occurs,that the pipes can handle the volume of water without impacting the proposed <br /> house. <br /> 5. The installation of the pipe may very well disturb more than 10 CY of material within the 0-75' area which would <br /> trigger the CUP. If you look at the invert of the pipe at the 75' setback it will be approximately at 944.00 <br /> elevation and the existing topo point is at 951.3'. This is a 7' deep trench and when you have an OSHA approved <br /> trench it will be at least 1:1 slopes if the soil are acceptable. That means there will be a 14' wide trench and will <br /> disturb more than 10 CY and a CUP will be triggered. <br /> 6. The grading along the west side of the property may be directing water onto the neighboring property. This <br /> runoff could affect the neighboring garage. The drainage should be directed to the east more to maintain the <br /> drainage on the property. Additionally,the applicant may want to consider installing some measures to slow or <br /> reduce the amount of water being directed down the property lines. By channelizing the runoff there is a <br /> potential of additional erosion on the slope. <br /> Jesse Struve, PE <br /> Director of Public Works/City Engineer <br /> City of Orono <br /> (952) 249-4661- Direct <br /> (952) 249-4616- Fax <br /> www.ci.orono.mn.us <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.