My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
02-22-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2016 11:09:01 AM
Creation date
2/25/2016 11:05:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 8, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 28 of 32 <br /> <br />12. MARIANI CONCEPTUAL REQUEST TO EXPAND MUSA BOUNDARY (continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the density on the James property is 2.75 currently and the Eisenger property would have a <br />density of approximately 5 to 6 units per acre in an area where it is guided for 10 to 15. Gaffron stated <br />Staff will need to look for other sites within Orono that can be guided for higher density if those two <br />properties are approved for lower density. <br /> <br />Loftus asked whether the City has previously included lakeshore properties in the MUSA. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the density issue goes back 10 or 15 years and that a majority of the shoreland areas were <br />included in the MUSA back in the early 2000s. With the previous Comprehensive Plan, the Metropolitan <br />Council required the City to guide more property at a higher density in order to develop more 2-acre lots. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it was her understanding that if the septic system is older than 1985, that the property <br />owner could hook into the city sewer or MUSA without it counting toward the City’s density. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated if it is brought into the MUSA, it counts against the City’s density. <br /> <br />McMillan asked when that was changed. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the Metropolitan Council will allow them in and that it appears to be fairly recently where <br />they have taken the position that it counts against the density. Gaffron stated Staff was informed of that at <br />the recent meeting with the Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />McMillan commented at one time the City had a cushion, but that it does not appear that exists any <br />longer. <br /> <br />Mariani stated it sounds like the City will encounter the density problem in the future but that he is hoping <br />the City will side with him in this case. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it does not make sense to run the sewer line down and then only hook up one property. <br /> <br />Mariani commented he does not know whether it will be necessary to hook up the second lot at this point. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it probably should have stayed as one lot. <br /> <br />Mariani stated if the property had remained one lot, he would have also paid less for the property. <br /> <br />McMillan stated he could go back to the septic contractor. <br /> <br />Mariani indicated they only carry a $10,000 bond. <br /> <br />Walsh stated they likely also have errors and omission insurance. <br /> <br />Mariani stated he was told he could apply for up to $10,000 against their bond. Mariani stated his whole <br />idea was to sell this house and construct a new house on the other property. Mariani noted he had to turn <br />down an offer to sell the property because he is not able to sell it.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.