My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-14-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
12-14-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 10:38:44 AM
Creation date
1/13/2016 10:36:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 14, 2015 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />16. #15-3794 TIM AND MARY DOUBEK — 4565 BAYSIDE ROAD — VARIANCE — <br />RESOLUTION NO. 6579 (continued) <br />Staff recommends approval and asks the Council to consider adopting the resolution that has been <br />provided. <br />David Bicker, Denali Custom Homes, stated he represents the homeowners and that he would be able to <br />answer the Council's questions. <br />Levang stated the drawings for the building are plain and typically the City Council likes a little more <br />architectural detail. Levang asked whether there will be a cupola or something that will help dress the <br />structure up. Levang noted to the east of this property the Whites have a similar barn which was nicely <br />done. <br />Bieker stated he is not familiar with their property. <br />Levang stated the site where this accessory building will be is somewhat visible from the road. Levang <br />stated she would like to see some additional architectural detail added to the building, such as a cupola, <br />shutters or window boxes. <br />Walsh asked if that is a required code item. <br />McMillan stated when there is a variance, the Council can ask for special conditions, especially since the <br />building is close to the road. <br />Mattick stated the Council needs to make sure that what the Council is requesting is in relation to what is <br />being proposed. <br />McMillan stated in the past the Council has required special architectural features on an accessory <br />structure when it is visible from the road and that they do not want a building that has an industrial or <br />commercial look to it. <br />Bicker stated he is in complete agreement and that the structure will have multiple colors to dress it up <br />and help it blend in with the environment. Bicker stated the property owners have to drive by the <br />structure to get to their home and that they would like it to look nice. Bicker noted it will actually be <br />completely impossible to see it from the road from any property. <br />Levang stated that is not true and that it will be located where the old apple orchard is <br />Bicker stated when he stands on the site, he cannot see the road. Bicker stated it is clearly indicated on <br />the survey that it is heavily wooded around the site and that there is an apple orchard in front of the <br />building, which makes it very difficult to see the building. Bicker stated they have no intentions of <br />constructing an ugly building where a million dollar home is being built and that they are proposing this <br />location because the new home is being built on the existing home site, which takes advantage of the <br />views of the lake. The previous home was slightly behind it but in the same general location as well. <br />Page 33 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.