Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 14, 2015 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />13. #15-3774 MICHAEL STEADMAN OBIO IRWIN ACOBS,1700 SHORELINE DRIVE — <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL — RESOLUTION NO. 6569 (continued) <br />Gaffron stated he has had a number of conversations with Mr. Beam regarding the level of completing or <br />addressing every item in the letter and determining which items are critical to have completed prior to <br />preliminary plat approval and which ones should be addressed prior to final plat approval. A number of <br />the comments relate to the Watershed District. Gaf&on stated he does have every expectation that <br />everything on that list will be addressed prior to final plat approval. <br />Dayton stated .Point 1.1 says that a bluff analysis should be submitted to confirm bluff areas on the <br />plans. Dayton stated he would further point out that the main point that the developer brought to the <br />table, probably at the first meeting, was when an engineered diagram was brought forward of what the <br />proposed construction route will look like, which really focused on the bluffs. Dayton stated he <br />specifically recalls the Council talking about that and how the bluffs were too steep to form a construction <br />route down through the bluffs. Dayton stated the bluffs have been an issue right from the beginning. <br />Dayton stated the neighborhood paid $2,000 for an engineering study to be done but that it unfortunately <br />was delivered by a person who was rather monotone and was only given five minutes to deliver a 10 - <br />point report. Dayton stated the one point that should have been focused on was why an alternative <br />construction route is a plausible concept. Dayton stated in his opinion the alternative construction route <br />has not been given enough time for study or discussion. Dayton stated in his view the residents tried to <br />do something that should have been considered by the City Council and it has not been given due <br />consideration. <br />Dayton indicated he did speak with one of the Council Members recently and that Council Member did <br />indicate that they put a lot of thought into the alternative road and had met with Mr. Gaffron and reviewed <br />it. Dayton stated he does appreciate that, but that in public format and public sessions it does not feel like <br />it has been given due process. Dayton stated he is presuming this will be approved tonight, but that he is <br />hoping the City Council will go through the process to determine whether the alternative road is viable. <br />Dayton stated he is not opposed to the development, and that at some point over the course of this, the <br />neighborhood suggested bringing the heavy construction equipment through Heritage Lane in stages. All <br />the residents are asking for is a more safe passage by having the developer essentially pay for an <br />alteration to a more permanent pass that exists between the bluffs and down the valley into the <br />construction area. Dayton stated he wants to make sure that has been heard and that it is on public record <br />tonight. <br />Dayton indicated he has also talked to another developer in Orono with quite a bit of experience. Dayton <br />stated he understands a bond for road surface damage to Heritage Lane has to be submitted and that the <br />damages are typically not mediated right away and assumes that the asphalt surfaces will be torn up with <br />all the heavy equipment. Dayton stated it likely will take three to five years to complete the project. <br />Dayton asked if it will be at the end of the three to five year period that repair of the asphalt road will be <br />completed. Dayton further asked what happens in the meantime as the road is torn up and whether the <br />developer is required to lay down Class 5 gravel as a replacement surface. Dayton stated street cleaning <br />would not do a whole lot of good if they are sweeping up a Class 5 roadway. <br />Page 28 of 44 <br />