My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 10:05:02 AM
Creation date
1/13/2016 10:04:27 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� I <br /> �Es oF� <br /> ORONO PLANNYNG CONIlVIISSION MEETIl�TG ' <br /> Monday,October 19,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> � <br /> 'v' <br /> Gaf&on statod they would hgve had the ability to replace it in kind if the garage still existed today,which � <br /> means no higher or wi�er. Gaf&on stabed when the garag�e came down,the priar owner had a year to ��,, <br /> `�. <br /> replace it,which they did not, so now�e newer owner must start from scratch. , <br /> Lemke stated if�e garage is moved forward,there would be less damage to the trces as well. <br /> Landgraver stated t�e Planning Commission is not in a position to redesign the garage,but that it appears <br /> the consensus of ti�e Planning Commission is that changes caa be made to the Iocation and size of the <br /> garage. Landgraver state�ha does acknowledge the hardcover is being raduced but the neighbors are <br /> opposed to t�e new garage. I.andgraver stated the Planning Commission can approve the application, <br /> deny it,or table the application to give the applicant time to radesign his�rage. Laadgraver staxed he is <br /> hearing from the Plarming Commission that the consensus is to deny it as proposed. <br /> Schoanzeit stated the applicants have not exhausbed all the options to minimi��e the impact to tha <br /> neighbars. <br /> Lappen stated attsching it to the housa is extremely more expensive. <br /> McGrann stated if the applicants and neighbors can reach sotne agreemont,those tend to hava much better <br /> reception in general}�y the Planning Commission. McGrann statad ha.ving this larg�e of e�age so much <br /> forward will be an issue the way it is groposed cutrently and that the applicant crn��d table it to look at <br /> constructing a siagle-car garage,wluch xnig�t sstisfy somc of the neighbor's concerns. <br /> Lappan stated thgt is an option as well. Lappen requesbed his application ba tabled so he caa radesigu it. <br /> Schoeazeit moved,McGrnnn secouded,to table Applicatian No. 15�769,Chria Lappen and KaIlyn <br /> Bialowas,3409 East Lake Street. VOTE: Ayee 4,Nsys 0. <br /> 4. #15-3787 DAVID AND LISA WII'SON,226�4 SHADYWOOD ROAD,VARIANCES,7:40 <br /> P.M.—8:04 P.M. <br /> David and Lisa Wipson,Applicaats,were present <br /> Page 16 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.