Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, October 19,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> 3. #15-3769 CHRIS LAPPEN AND KALLYN BIALOWAS,3409 EAST LAKE STREET, <br /> VARIANCES, 7:02 P.M.—7:40 P.M. <br /> Chris Lappen, Applicant, was present. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting variances to construct a 21' x 21' detached garage. Tlle <br /> applicants have 61 percent hardcover on the property currently and would be reducing it to 49 percent. <br /> Currently they are allowed 25 percent. The lot consists of 5,562 square feet in a 2-acre zone. The <br /> proposed garage is located five feet from the east side lot line and will replace a garage that was removed <br /> approximately eight years ago. The proposed garage is being moved further from the creek but will still <br /> be 18.5 feet from the creek where a 75-foot setback is normally required. <br /> Early in the application process there was concern about having to place fill in the floodplain area. Based <br /> on discussions with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District,the flood elevation is 935' and the <br /> applicants will not need to fill within the floodplain. <br /> The application also involves a setback from the existin�house of 10 feet, which meets the standard. The <br /> applicants could move the garage forward but that would require an additional variance to be less than 10 <br /> feet from a structure. Staff is not recommending that. The property is allowed 1500 square feet structural <br /> feet because the lot is less than 10,000 square feet. The property is currently at 1,615 square feet,just <br /> slightly over the limit. The applicants could reduce both dimensions of the garage by a few inches and <br /> meet the 1500 square feet but Staff does not feel that is a big issue. The applicants could make it a single- <br /> stall garage and attach it to the house but that is not what the applicants prefer. <br /> As it relates to the average lakeshore setback variance,the proposed garage is completely beyond the line. <br /> The property is severely limited by the size and shape of the lot,the location and orientation of the <br /> existing house, and the limitations imposed by the creek that is considered as lakeshore for zoning <br /> purposes. In Staff's opinion the proposed garage location would appear to be reasonable for a minimum- <br /> sized detached two-stall garage. <br /> Page 9 of 44 <br />