My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
10-19-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 9:15:37 AM
Creation date
1/13/2016 9:15:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is <br /> located." <br /> See#8. <br /> 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant." <br /> Granting of the application wiil substantially offset the significant limitations on the enjoyment <br /> of the property rights which were created in 2008. <br /> 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort, morals,or <br /> in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the ZonRng Code." <br /> No impact noted. <br /> 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenfence to the applicant, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficuFty." <br /> The practical limitations on the use of this property are real, substantial,and documented. <br /> Practical Difficulties Statement <br /> Should you feef the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria,describe the <br /> practical difficuities pre�enting compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines <br /> (attach additional sheets if necessary): <br /> Due to the builder's inability ta use the prior basement and compliance with an incorrect utility <br /> easement, safety,storage and living space were compromised.The current property has no safe haven <br /> for severe weather and inadequate storage for a single family household.The small two car attached <br /> garage will house two vehicles, however, does not permit adequate storage of other common items to a <br /> waterfront property such as lawnmower, snowblower,yard equipment,bicycles, fake equipment/ <br /> accessories, decorations,freezer,personal watercraft,snowmobiles, general storage,etc. The <br /> previously approved�ariance consisted of two parts: <br /> • Setback variance for proposed garage/house addition <br /> + 289 sq.ft.structural variance resulting in 16.996 coverage (242'over the 15%level) <br /> 0 145 sq.ft.addition to home (two story with 2'cant+lever) <br /> 0 144 sq.ft.accessory building(with basement and 2' cantilever) <br /> While the tatal square footage requested would reasonably remedy the practical difficulties associated <br /> with the safety and storage issues,the two separate additions are awkward and inefficient in the <br /> utilization of that space. A better remedy is proposed in combining the structural coverage variance into <br /> one. The setback variance is no longer applicable or necessary in this new proposal. <br /> #� � � �7. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.