Laserfiche WebLink
15-3770 <br /> August 92,2015 <br /> Page 4 aF 5 <br /> Easements Needed <br /> Standazd peri.meter drainage and utility easements will be required along all properry boundaries <br /> in the plat as well as Conservation and Flowage Easements over the delineated wetlands and <br /> drainageways. <br /> Stormwater and Drainage Improvements <br /> Due to the lazge size lots,the ne.ed for stormwater improvements appears to be limited to erosion <br /> control and floodplain management (see Engineer's comments). The properly will be subject to <br /> the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee of$3,075 per acre based on two buildable lots in the 5- <br /> acre zone.The fee is based on 5 acres fox each Iot,or$15,375 per lot(Total due would be�30,750). <br /> A potential reduction of up to 50% of the fee is possible based on placement of upland azeas iunto <br /> conservation easements resulting from the Conservation design process. <br /> Utility Locations and Availability <br /> The property will be served by private on-site systems and private wells. Septic sites have been <br /> established an.d well locations will not be an issue. <br /> Wetlands on Site and/or Impacted <br /> A wetland delineation has been performed but MCWD approval for the wetland boundaries has <br /> yet to be received, Wetlands on the property will not be impacted, with the potential exception of <br /> the driveway corridor along the west side of proposed Lot 1. The actual square£ootage of wetland <br /> that will be filled to create the driveway is not known at this time. The MCWD will be involved <br /> in establishment of mitigation requirements if needed, and would also be establishing appropriate <br /> wetland buffers for the development. The City will require a Conservation and Flowage Easement <br /> over the wetlands. Measures to avoid or mitigate floodplain impacts will be critical in developing <br /> the driveway in this cvrridor. <br /> Woodland Impacts & Conservation Design <br /> The applicants were advised that tlus subdiv�ision would be subject to the City's Conservation <br /> Design Ordinance. A Conservation Desi� Report has not been submitted — applicants are <br /> proceeding to have that study completed. The property should be reviewed in terms of the Rura1 <br /> Oasis goals and policies which have been approved by the City Council and are supported within <br /> the Conservation Design ordinauce. <br /> With the exception of the trees in the yard area near the existing residence, wooded areas within <br /> the site appear to be lineaz, generally following fence lines or wetland boundaries. <br /> City Engineer Comments <br /> The City Engineer has pzovided a number of general and detailed comments {Eahibit D) wb�ich <br /> the applicants aze advised to review and address as the preliminary and final plat move forward. <br /> A brief suinmary of his comments includes: <br /> General: <br /> -Demolition plan should be provided prior to fmal plat approval <br /> -Erosion Control Plan will be required <br /> - A Vegetation Management Plan should be submitted with regard to wetland buffers{will likely be <br /> included in Conservation Design Report) <br /> - Shared driveway design must be submitted and driveway constructed at the time of platting <br /> - Maintenance Agreenr►ent for shared driveway should be submitted <br /> -Multiple comments regarding driveway for lot 1 due to wet�and and floodplain concerns <br />