My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 8:43:11 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 1:34:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 15,2015 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> patterns will be maintained, and long views into the site will not be significantly disrupted. A vegetation <br /> management plan lists a variety of actions to be taken with regard to wetland buffer areas,buckthorn, and <br /> reed canary grass. The majority of the site is open and will remain as is. <br /> Gaffron noted a landscape plan has not been included in the packet. One of the City requirements is that <br /> on the boulevards there be a tree located every 40 feet. Within the last couple of years, the City Council <br /> has looked at similar plats with a long road and was not excited about trying to create a parkway concept <br /> similar to what exists on Kelly Parkway. The Council's conclusion was that that does not necessarily <br /> create the rural character the City would like. The applicant has provided a landscape plan that provides <br /> some variety. The Planning Commission should review the landscape plan and determine whether it is <br /> reasonable. <br /> The Planning Commission should discuss the following issues: <br /> 1. The potential for making road corridor connections to the west ar south. <br /> 2. The developer should be made aware that City determinations of building height and number of <br /> stories rely on the use of existing grades. It would be of benefit to the developer to confer with <br /> Staff regarding the potential benefits of establishing new existing grades on certain lots by <br /> creating building pads during the site improvements grading process. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission should review the Conservation Design materials and determine <br /> whether there are any potential concerns. <br /> Staff recommends approval, subject to the following: <br /> 1. Applicant should be advised to address the items detailed in the City Engineer's comments. <br /> 2. Final approvals should include clear documentation of the re-oriented yard requirements for <br /> Lots 1 and 6. <br /> Page 47 of 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.