Laserfiche WebLink
1- j <br /> 15-3763 <br /> July 16,2015 <br /> Page 5 of B <br /> such a cox�necting corridor. <br /> Because Kintyre Lane is a private road which will soon become completely under control of a <br /> homeowners association rather than guided by the developer of Kintyre, the City Attorney has <br /> been working with the developer of Kintyre and Bollis' attorney to establish easement rights and <br /> maintenance responsibilities for the extension of Kintyre Lane to serve this proposed <br /> developmen� Those discussions are still underway as of this writing; however, it appears that <br /> some agreement will be forthcom��in the neaz future. <br /> The preliminary plat depicts a proposed road corridor width of 50 feet which meets code. The <br /> standard minimum paved width for a road serving more than 7 units would be 28', and this <br /> would be a rural section (shoulders and ditches) except where curbing is necessary to manage <br /> stormwater. The plans indicate a 30' street width (back to back of surmountable curb) which <br /> apparently is necessaty to direct road runoff to the pmposed stormwater pond. For engineering <br /> discussion is the fact that Kintyre Lane is only 2b' wide (back of curb to back of curb) as it was <br /> only designed to serve 6 homes and meets code for 6 homes. With adding 7 more homes using <br /> the road, existing Kintyre Lane will become substandard in width... <br /> Road Improvements andlor Easements Needed <br /> The City will require a Road, Drainage and Utilities Easement over the private road. Standard <br /> perimeter drainage and utility easements wil� be required along all property boundaries in the <br /> plat as well as Conservation and Flowage Easements over all delineated wetlands and <br /> drainageways. Whether existing Kintyre Lane should be widened may be worthy of discussion, <br /> but to do so would be expensive and likely meet with significant resistance from the existing <br /> neighbarhood and have significant cost ramifications. <br /> At the sketch plan review it was noted by one Council member that the existing cul�e-sac <br /> perhaps should be removed. There are likely pros and cons to daing so, and it would require <br /> cooperation and acceptance by the existing Kintyre neighbors. <br /> Park/Trail Easement/Fees or Ded'rcation Needed <br /> Although the Pazk Commission has nat reviewed the proposed piat, it is anticipated that no land <br /> for a public park is required, in part due to the remoteness of the deueloping area from public <br /> roads. The C�VIP indicates that a future trail is proposed along Stubbs Bay Road, connecting <br /> from a co�aceptual trail along the south side af the Burlington Northern raalroad corridor down to <br /> the shore of Stubbs Bay. Whether this trail will ever be completed is unknown; a 14' easement <br /> along the west boundary for future trail purposes should be considered. Additionally, as 6 new <br /> building sites are being proposed, payment of the standard Park Dedication fee for 6 new <br /> building lots would be appropriate; the current fee is $5,550 per lot or a total of 533,300. <br /> Stormwater and Drainage Improvements <br /> Creation of a new private road requires stormwater stormwater management measures, and <br /> theose proposed include a stormwater pond located within Lots 2 & 3 as well as road curbing <br /> and stormsewer piping to convey runoff to the pond. Ponding ateas will require the <br /> establishment of easements and the ponding areas up to the outlet level aze not creditable as dry <br /> buildable area. <br /> The properly will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee, resulting in a fee of 6 <br /> lots @$7680/1Qt=$46,080. <br />