My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 11:49:25 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 11:47:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
612
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, MINiJTES OF THE <br /> 4RON0 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Leskinen stated it is probably not possible to include evety possible scenario and that sometimes broader <br /> language is better. <br /> Schoenzeit stated if the City wants to exclude something,tt�ey should say tha� <br /> Thiesse stated he is not advocating to not allow tattoo removal but that the Planning Commission should <br /> ciiscuss that. <br /> Leskinen stated what service a person receives at a salon is also changing. <br /> Gaffi�on stated it is simple enough in the code to list all the things that are excluded. <br /> Leskinen asked if there are any particular services the PIanning Commission would like to exclude. <br /> Leskinen stated in her view the Plymouth deSnition covers it very well and that she cannot think of a <br /> specific service thst she would like to exclude. Leskinen stated the Coon Rapids'defuution is broader. <br /> G�rtis noted the City Attomey recammended#tze City specificalty list the services the City would allow. <br /> Leskinen stabed in that case the Plymouth example appcars to be ti�e most thorough and that she does not <br /> see anything in particular that should be disallowed. <br /> Lemke noted the Coon Rapids' d�nition states certified or licensed msssage therapist by the city. <br /> Curtis stated the state licenses the aesthetician and hair people but that the City licenses the massage <br /> tt�erapists. Ctirtis noted this definition would not change that process at all. <br /> T}�iesse stsied in his view tattoo nemovat would be allowed under tt�e Plymouth definition. <br /> Landgraver stated in his view a tattoo parlor is not something that Orono would wa.nt to have but that <br /> pecfiaps the City Council could weigh in on whether it should be excluded. <br /> Thiesse commented a person may receive better service if the business provides more than one type of <br /> service. <br /> Schoenzeit stated the City cannot ask a business ta offer multiple services. <br /> Gaf�Zon stated he would suggest the Planning Commissioners drive�round some strip malIs in other cities <br /> to see if there is something that st�nds out. <br /> Thiesse asked if someone from Staff could call Plymouth to see wha.t kind of problems they have had. <br /> Gaf�'ran indicated Staff could ca1l. <br /> Leskinen asked if StafFwould like a specific recommendation tonigh� <br /> Curtis stated that would be ideal,but that if the Planning Commission is not able to make that specific <br /> direction,they could table it� <br /> Page 35 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.