Laserfiche WebLink
NIINUTES OF THE � <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMIVIISSION MEETING <br /> - Monday,May 18,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'cIock p.m. <br /> Bollis stated what is being depictad is a boilerplate housc pad and is not going to be the exact house in <br /> that location. Bollis stated Lot 6 could accommodate a walkout birt that it would be up to the builder. <br /> Bollis indicated he would Iike to design the homes according to the topography of the lots. <br /> Latidgraver stated before the applicant goes before the City Council,he may want to consider some type <br /> of Landscaping or screening to minimize the impacts to the noighbors. <br /> The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. <br /> 7. #15-3732 CITY QF ORONO,AMEND CITY CODE SECTION 78-1 DEFINITIONS,ADD <br /> BARBER SHOPS AND BEAUT'Y SHOP,10:05 P.M.—14:20 P.M. <br /> Curtis stated the City was recently approached with a request to operate what was described as a high-end <br /> aail salon in an existing building in Navatxe. Barbec shops and beauty shops are pez7mitt�ed uses witfiin the <br /> B-1 retail sales business district,the B-3 shopping center dish�ict,and the B-S limited neighborhood <br /> business district. <br /> Currently there is no definrtion outlining what services are included in a barber shop or beauty shop <br /> withiuu the zoning code. Staff is not proposing a change per se but rather to add a definition and perhaps <br /> the types of services to be provided so that when a sunilar yuestion cumes up, Staff would be better to <br /> answer it. Cwti,s noted it is not unusual for the use to be specifically defined,but that this is an <br /> opportunity for�e City to put some parameters on!�e use. <br /> Staff has done some preliminary research as a starting poi�for the Planning Commission's review. tn <br /> StafFs view,the Plymouth definition encompasses a aumber of the services that would narma,lly be <br /> cammon. Staff is not proposing to change any of ifie language regarding the City's massage licenses. <br /> Curtis requested the Planning Commission look over the options and provide Staff with some guidance. <br /> Thiesse asked if the Planning Commission went with the Plymouth definition as it relates to nonsurgical <br /> cosmetic prooedures,whether tattoo replacement and removal wouid be included in that or construed to <br /> be incluaed. <br /> Curtis stated that is a good question and thst the Plemiing Commission could decide whether it should be <br /> included in the definition. <br /> Schoenzeit stated if the definition does not specifically exclude that, it likaly stil(would be coverad given <br /> the broad languagc in thc Plymouth de5nition. <br /> Curtis stated the Plymouth definition is a starting point that the Planning Commission could use. <br /> Leskinen opened the public hearing st 10:13 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this applicatian. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 10:13 p.m. <br /> Page 34 of 37 <br />