Laserfiche WebLink
MIlVUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,Z015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Bollis indicated that is coirect. Bollis stated if they were to plat a corridor out to Sttabbs Bay Road,hc <br /> would like to discuss what the purpose of the corridor would be. Bollis stated there is zero inbent for <br /> future development of that pam,el,and even if there were a corridor out to Stuhbs Bay, it would not sorve <br /> anything if someone were to develop that. Bollis indicated the potential lots off of Stubbs Bay Road <br /> would have access off of Stubbs Hay Road. <br /> Thiasse stated eliminating the cul�e-sac off of Stubbs Bay Road would simply force the road furtfier <br /> down and then require the road to come back up and around. <br /> Bollis noted there wonld also be a number of trecs that would be impacted. <br /> Thiesse asked if the roadway coming off thc existing cul�ie-sac is pretty steep. <br /> Bollis stated thero is a tiny section of the property that has an 1 S percont grade in Lat 2. Bollis stated it <br /> would be Less than 1,000 square feet. Bollis stated the homes would be walk-outs and very little grading <br /> would be rec�uired. <br /> Thiesse asked if the apglicant would be connecting his house to the cul-de-sac. <br /> Bollis indicated he would be. <br /> Gaffron asked if tha�t potentially eliuninates the cozridor off of Stubbs Bay. <br /> Bollis stated in lus view it would stay in ownership bo tb.at piece of property and potefftially not bc usad. <br /> Gaffron noted between Lots 4 and 5 the property line goes through thc septic f eld. <br /> Bollis indicated it would cut off a corner of tlie septic site. <br /> Thiesse notsd a new septic system would li�cely be required if a new home is built <br /> Gat�'ron stated they would nead two sites that could be utilizsd for sepdc. <br /> Leskinen indicated she is in agreeutcnt with Gaffron rega,rdiung Lots 1 and 2 and to leave the width as is <br /> given how the wedand Iimits�e placement of the house. <br /> Gaffrnn stated the wetland could perhaps be split between the two lots,which would leave bath lots at <br /> 175 fcet. Gaffron stated he does not L�ow,however, if there is a justification to vary on that. <br /> Landgcavet asked how the applicant feels about compressing Lots S,6 and 7 into two lots rather than <br /> three. <br /> Bollis stated the way they have the house pads on the lots currently,they are conforming and it will <br /> depend on the septic testing. <br /> Leskinen stated it appears to be a reasonable plan but the chain of cul-de-sacs might be a little concerning. <br /> Leskinen stated she is nat sure what can be done to resolvc that. <br /> Page 32 of 37 <br />