My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 11:49:25 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 11:47:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
612
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NIINUTES OF TI� <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMII�SSI�N MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,2415 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Gaffron stated the Planning Commission should discuss the proposed sketch plan and grovide dire�tion to <br /> the applicant. <br /> Leskinen asked if the lot next to Stubbs Bay Road is the applicant's residence. <br /> Gaf�'ron pointed out tfte lot that currendy has a house on it as weIl as the applicant's lot. <br /> Cluistopher Bol�is,Applicant,3265 Lafayette Ridge Court,stated he owns 350 Stubbs Bay Road btrt that <br /> he does nat reside there. Botlis indicated}us parents do live on Lot 2 and have resided there for 41 years <br /> with no plans to move at the pressnt time. <br /> Leskinen stated the reason she asked sbout whether that was part of the subject property is because she <br /> was wondering whether that particular avenue between that home and the barn could perlaaps provids <br /> access to Stubbs Bay Road instead of having the connecting cul-da-sacs. Leskinen indicated as she was <br /> looking at Exhibit E,she felt there were some ot�er options. <br /> Ballis indicated that strip of land is approximatoly 16 feet wide and is basically for a driveway to 200 <br /> Stubbs Bay Road. <br /> Leskirsen asked if that is tha residenco that is located by the trees. <br /> Bollis stated that is correct. <br /> Landgraver aslced if the Planning Commission should discuss diroct access to Stubbs Bay Road. <br /> Gaffron slat�d an outlot would be cc�nsisl.ent with what the City has done in similar situations where there <br /> is an opportunity to mske a through road at some point in fihe future. The majority of those roads have <br /> never been connected up to the present time. <br /> Leskinen asked if the wooded area is ali dsy buildable or whether it is wetland. <br /> Bollis indicated it is largcly upland. <br /> Gaffron stated tha low area is ti�e little finger of land. <br /> Thiesse stated the problem with the twa cul�e-sacs is they both come from the sam.e spot and cut Stubbs <br /> Bay Road off. Thiesse stated the convenience in other similar sit�atians would be far maintenance aad <br /> access by emergency vehicles,which does not seem to be the case in this situation. <br /> Lemke asiced if that is al1 private property where the existing home is located. <br /> Gaf&on indicated there is a strangeZy shaped outlot that serves two homes. <br /> Lemke asked if that coutd be the access to the cul-de-sac. <br /> Gaffron stated it is a possibility,but to his knowledge it was not platted as a road but rather as a shared <br /> driveway. <br /> Page 31 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.