My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 11:49:25 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 11:47:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
612
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#15-3740 <br /> June 15,2615 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> The property has areas of existing woods throughout the property.Tree preservation easements could be <br /> considered. <br /> Wetiands on Site and/or Impacted <br /> According to the submitted survey there are three wetlands on the property; one wetland straddling the <br /> narth lot line, artother straddling the east property line, and the larger one in the southern quarter of the <br /> property. The wetland delineations have been approved by the MCWD. The required 35' setback is <br /> shown on lot 1, it should also be shown on tot 2. Flowage and Conservation Easement5 over all wetlands <br /> and buffers designated on the site will be required. <br /> Road Improvements and/or Easements Needed <br /> The Cify requires standard perimeter, drainage ar�d utility easements around all property boundaries in <br /> the plat as well as Conservation and Flowage Easements over the delineated wetEands and wetland <br /> buffers. Additionaify, the Planning Commission may recommend conservation easements o�er wooded <br /> areas or other features may be deemed necessary following a conservation design analysis. <br /> Stormwater and Drainage Improvements <br /> The development is subject to the Stormwate� and Drainage Trunk Fee of $3,840 per acre x 2 acres = <br /> $7,680.00. There are no streets proposed with this plat, therefore no need to add additional stormwater <br /> retention. <br /> Park/Trall Easernent/Fees or Dedication Needed <br /> The 2008-2030 CMP Comprehensi�e Trai)System Map{Exhibit F) indicates that a future traii is planned on <br /> Old Crystal Bay Road South. The Planning Commission should discuss the merits of an easement for trail <br /> purposes adjacent to Oid Crystal Bay Road South. This will also be provided to the Park Comrr�ission for <br /> consideration at their July 6th meeting. <br /> The Park Fee is determined as 8% of the fair market value of the land being subdivided, or a maximum af <br /> $5,550 per residential dwelling unit. The Hennepin County Assessor has indicated that 8% of the raw land <br /> value will exceed the maximum fee. Therefore, fo�this property, staff has determined that as there will <br /> only be one new dwelling site,the Park Fee will be$5,550. <br /> Utility Locations and Availabili#y <br /> �he subject property is not located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA}; sewer service is <br /> not available to these properties. The properties are proposed to be served by septic systems and private <br /> wells. All septic systems must be located 20'from all property boundaries, 20' from structures, hardcover <br /> and the delineated edge of wetlands. The alternative septic system for lot one is shown 12 feet from the <br /> north property line. Private wells shall be setback 3'#rom structures and 50'from septic systems. <br /> Issues for Discussion <br /> Conservation Desian: A conservation desfgn report has been submitted, attached as Exhibit E. The <br /> Conservation Design Master plan includes three significant tree stands, primarily consisting of White Pine <br /> and Silver Maple. The plan includes an evaluation of the invasive species on the property. The praperty <br /> intends to address the long term management of the invasive species through herbicide and mechanical <br /> removal, as well as buyer initiated management. Additionally, the P(anning Commisslan should identify <br /> areas which should be reviewed, protected or preserved as part of the plat if appropriate. <br /> Lot line between lots 1 and 2. The property boundary between the two lots created conflict with the <br /> location of the existing garage. Garages aver 1000 s.f. must be setback 30 feet from the side properly line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.