My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/15/2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
06/15/2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 10:32:36 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 10:32:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNWG COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 15,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> it. Funk stated access to the north may be an issue, but the elevation of Old Crystal Bay Road was <br /> lowered by two feet. Funk stated if the driveway is put on grade, which their driveway is, it should be <br /> almost the same view, so it should not be a problem. Funk stated they were going to include a split <br /> driveway but Staff said it would have a better chance of being approved if it is not a split driveway. <br /> Lemke asked if the 1,008 square feet was a mistake. <br /> Funk stated that was his mistake, and that they originally took the size of the garage with the siding on it, <br /> and the surveyor said it is the footprint of the concrete block that is measured. <br /> Leskinen asked if they will require a 15 or 30-foot setback. <br /> Barnhart stated anything above 1,000 square feet would require a 30-foot setback. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. <br /> David Harmon, 505 South Old Crystal Bay Road, stated he and his wife are in support of the application <br /> and that in their view another home will have any adverse impact on them. Harmon stated they are <br /> looking forward to having another family in the neighborhood. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 8:36 p.m. <br /> Leskinen suggested the Planning Commission start with the garage setback. <br /> McGrann asked what options the Planning Commission has. <br /> Landgraver stated it would either require a 30-foot setback or require a variance application. <br /> Leskinen stated it would be easier to move the line than the building. Leskinen stated since this is a new <br /> lot,the City would not be willing to create a substandard lot, and that the size of the building could either <br /> be reduced or the line changed. <br /> Schoenzeit noted it will be a much sharper angle. Schoenzeit asked if the lot line rearrangement would <br /> impact the septic site. <br /> Barnhart stated if the line is shifted over 15 feet to the north, it would not really impact the septic site in <br /> terms of serving the lot to the north. If the line is shifted to the other side of the septic system, that lot <br /> would become too small. <br /> Landgraver asked where the line would intersect on the right-hand side. Landgraver asked if that is a <br /> wetland in that area. <br /> Barnhart illustrated on the overhead where the line would be. <br /> Thiesse asked if the City has any criteria about a newly created lot having an old septic site. <br /> Barnhart stated the City has a report on the septic system and the septic inspector is comfortable with that <br /> report. <br /> Page 19 of 53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.