My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/18/2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
05/18/2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 10:27:45 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 10:27:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
View images
View plain text
M ., <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,2015 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> Bollis indicated that is correct. Bollis stated if they were to plat a corridor out to Stubbs Bay Road, he <br /> would like to discuss what the purpose of the corridor would be. Bollis stated there is zero intent for <br /> future development of that parcel, and even if there were a corridor out to Stubbs Bay, it would not serve <br /> anything if someone were to develop that. Bollis indicated the potential lots off of Stubbs Bay Road <br /> would have access off of Stubbs Bay Road. <br /> Thiesse stated eliminating the cul-de-sac off of Stubbs Bay Road would simply force the road further <br /> down and then require the road to come back up and around. <br /> Bollis noted there would also be a number of trees that would be impacted. <br /> Thiesse asked if the roadway coming off the existing cul-de-sac is pretty steep. <br /> Bollis stated there is a tiny section of the property that has an 18 percent grade in Lot 2. Bollis stated it <br /> would be less than 1,000 square feet. Bollis stated the homes would be walk-outs and very little grading <br /> would be required. <br /> Thiesse asked if the applicant would be connecting his house to the cul-de-sac. <br /> Bollis indicated he would be. <br /> Gaffron asked if that potentially eliminates the corridor off of Stubbs Bay. <br /> Bollis stated in his view it would stay in ownership to that piece of property and potentially not be used. <br /> Gaffron noted between Lots 4 and 5 the property line goes through the septic field. <br /> Bollis indicated it would cut off a corner of the septic site. <br /> Thiesse noted a new septic system would likely be required if a new home is built. <br /> Gaffron stated they would need two sites that could be utilized for septic. <br /> Leskinen indicated she is in agreement with Gaffron regarding Lots 1 and 2 and to leave the width as is <br /> given how the wetland limits the placement of the house. <br /> Gaffron stated the wetland could perhaps be split between the two lots, which would leave both lots at <br /> 175 feet. Gaffron stated he does not know, however, if there is a justification to vary on that. <br /> Landgraver asked how the applicant feels about compressing Lots 5, 6 and 7 into two lots rather than <br /> three. <br /> Bollis stated the way they have the house pads on the lots currently,they are conforming and it will <br /> depend on the septic testing. <br /> Leskinen stated it appears to be a reasonable plan but the chain of cul-de-sacs might be a little concerning. <br /> Leskinen stated she is not sure what can be done to resolve that. <br /> Page 32 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).