My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-14-2015 Councill Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
12-14-2015 Councill Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2015 10:02:41 AM
Creation date
12/23/2015 9:37:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1094
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 27 of 41 <br /> <br />Walsh stated in his view that would fit better. Walsh stated in his view the side setbacks should all at <br />least be 10 feet and that 5-foot setbacks are not good for anybody from a neighborhood standpoint. <br /> <br />Wasmoen commented the 5-foot setbacks work in his neighborhood. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the beauty is in the eye of the beholder and that he would like to see 10-foot side setbacks. <br /> <br />Printup stated he is in agreement with Council Member Walsh and that they are two distinct parcels. <br />Printup stated he has a concern with the traffic coming onto Shadywood and going through the more <br />dense area. Printup stated he is not sure he likes the style of the shared driveway concept and that he is in <br />agreement with the 10-foot setbacks. Printup indicated he also is in agreement with fewer homes on the <br />Kelly side. <br /> <br />Cornick stated he would support three houses on the Kelly Avenue parcel and that he likes the other part <br />of the sketch plan. Cornick stated he can see three to four homes maximum on the Kelly Avenue side. <br /> <br />Walsh stated this is a great piece of property and that they can do something unique rather than trying to <br />jam in as many homes as possible. <br /> <br />Wasmoen stated every time they have presented to the City Council, the plan has gotten better. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the issue is the density. McMillan stated she wanted to look at a PUD since it would <br />allow for one access and would offer more protection to the trees. McMillan stated if this land is <br />subdivided into three or four one-acre lots, whoever owns the property can do whatever they want with <br />the trees except for what is in the conservation zone. McMillan stated the problem is that it is too dense <br />and that she would like the developer to look at it closer to see how they can accomplish a lesser number <br />of units and save more trees. <br /> <br />Wasmoen noted they have reduced it by two units. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the northwest corner is not where the better trees are located and that the better trees are <br />further south. McMillan stated based on what they are seeing tonight, it appears the Council is not <br />interested in this PUD sketch plan and that the developer should go back to two separate parcels and <br />developing them independently of each other. <br /> <br />Wasmoen asked if they can agree that the homes can be gathered at one end of the lot rather than spread <br />out over the lot. Wasmoen stated they are trying to protect the natural portion of the lot and that this end <br />is the more buildable end of the parcel. <br /> <br />Wasmoen stated one of the things they heard was not putting anybody back out on Kelly. Wasmoen <br />stated if they constructed homes on one street, there could be one access point. Wasmoen stated there has <br />been a lot of back and forth in terms of trying to reduce the impact on Kelly Avenue. Wasmoen stated <br />they can possibly take out four more homes and then pull some of the other homes back another 50 feet, <br />which would get everybody to a good compromise but yet still have enough units to create an HOA to <br />take care of the street and the landscaping and other common areas rather than trying to create three <br />separate homes and four separate homes. Wasmoen noted the guiding shows much higher density than <br />what they are proposing currently. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.