My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
10-12-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 2:20:21 PM
Creation date
12/1/2015 2:02:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
960
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />15-3770 460 Orchard Park Road <br />October 7, 2015 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />dry buildable acreage within each lot while establishing desirable homesites and incorporating <br />suitable sites for on-site sewage treatment systems. <br />The property includes a considerable amount of delineated wetland in 4 distinct basins, scattered <br />among low hills. Most of the property is open fields, with scattered trees near the homestead and <br />along wetland edges. <br /> <br /> PLEASE REVIEW THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO & EXHIBITS <br /> <br />Planning Commission Review <br />Minutes of the August 17 Planning Commission meeting are attached. Planning Commission <br />reviewed the proposal and found that it appeared to be compliant with code requirements, with <br />the exception that the defined width of proposed Lot 1 as measured at the 100’ front setback line <br />is approximately 110’ where 300’ is normally required. The practical difficulty for this variance <br />is the shape of the underlying property, with its relatively minimal frontage on Orchard Park <br />Road yet comprising over 23 acres in total area. <br />Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to the <br />following: <br />1. Conservation Design Report must be submitted for review by staff prior to Council <br />review of the application. (Conservation Design Report has now been submitted – see Exhibit B) <br />2. Applicant shall agree to construct the shared driveway as a development improvement <br />rather than waiting for home construction to begin. <br />3. Address City Engineer comments and recommendations prior to Council review. <br />(Revised plans – see Exhibit A – were submitted on October 5 but have not yet been reviewed by <br />the City Engineer) <br />4. Adhere to recommendations of Fire Marshal as to individual driveway width and <br />configuration. (See comments below) <br />5. Approval of the lot width variance for Lot 1. <br /> <br /> <br />Topics for Discussion <br />Wetland Impacts. The wetland boundaries have been confirmed by the MCWD. The applicants’ <br />engineer has provided revised plans that detail the proposed wetland impacts of the proposed <br />driveway to serve the residence on Lot 1. This access drive makes use of an existing field road, <br />but its expansion to a 10-12’ width will require some filling of wetland and establishment of an <br />appropriately-sized culvert. This will require review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek <br />Watershed District, and may require mitigation. <br />The proposed shared driveway as well as the driveway for Lot 1 appear to encroach the required <br />35’ City wetland setback for structures and hardcover in a few areas, due to the wetland <br />locations. Where feasible, the driveway should be adjusted to meet the 35’ setback; where not <br />feasible, a variance to that setback would appear to be necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.