My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3320
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3300 - 3399 (July 12, 1993 - March 14, 1994)
>
Resolution 3320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2015 12:49:20 PM
Creation date
11/19/2015 12:49:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, • . <br /> . ._, <br /> � O� <br /> � O :. � O CITY of ORONO <br /> • � � �?��=� RE50LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � ��' �,�.:: ,�„ <br /> '�► t. .��,� �' NO. � �� � � <br /> ti <br /> ���x og�G <br /> ESii <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 16, 1993, <br /> and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following <br /> findings: <br /> A. � The proposed improvement will result in a reduction of 2.5% hardcover <br /> within the 0-75' setback area and a 2.73% reduction in the 75-250' <br /> setback area. <br /> B. The sloping elevations at the building setback line and existing mature <br /> year round vegetation minunize the visual impact of the new structure <br /> upon adjacent residences. � <br /> C. The City has received no negative comments from the adjacent neighbors <br /> notified of the variance request. <br /> • <br /> • D. The steep lakeshore banks will minimize impact of structure upon lake <br /> views from lakeshore. <br /> 4. The Ciry Council finds that the conditions existing on this properry are peculiar <br /> � to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> � granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br /> right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments . <br /> by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. � <br />; <br /> Page 2 of 6 - <br />� . ro�,saosa�an�o <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.