Laserfiche WebLink
' ` � ' Y . . , . . <br /> • • I O� • � <br /> • O O <br /> �6. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � ti <br /> '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �L�k'E Ho4'�'G � NO. � s � 6 - <br /> � S - <br /> ;. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 20, <br /> 1996, and recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variance based <br /> upon the following unique findings and hardships: <br /> A. The home was built prior to the Shoreland Regulations approved by the <br /> � City in 1992. The structure was built in 1983 through 1984. <br /> B. The original residence structure conformed to all pertinent Shoreland <br /> Regulatioris at that time. <br /> C. The entire residence structure is located within the 75-150' setback area <br /> where no structural improvements are allowed. The entire structure is <br /> nonconforming. <br /> • D. Based on peninsula shape of the Dayton property and as a result of the <br /> new Shoreland Regulations that redefined what was once a wetland to a <br /> Natural Environment Lake, the majority of dry building area is <br /> unbuildable. <br /> E. The improvements will not result in new hardcover as all additions or <br /> expansions will be placed over existing structure or deck. � <br /> F. Applicants have legally combined Lots 1 and 2 to offset any hardcover <br /> excess within the 75-250' setback area. <br /> G. Hardcover within the 75-250' setback of combined Lots 1 and 2 is <br /> 18,975 s.f. or 13.4%. The proposed improvement will not result in an <br /> increase in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. <br /> H. The applicants cannot expand upon their residence without first obtaining <br /> a variance as a result of the new Shoreland Regulations. <br /> • Page 2 of 5 <br />