My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3748
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3700 - 3799 (March 11, 1996 - November 12, 1996)
>
Resolution 3748
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 2:00:29 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 2:00:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� o� � <br /> � o 0 <br /> �b. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � F <br /> ���: �G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> . �kESH.04 NO. <br /> 3 � 48 <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1996 and <br /> recommended approval of the variance application as amended based upon the <br /> following unique findings and hardships: <br /> A. The existing topography and location of mature plantings minimize the . <br /> visual impact of the upper level deck on the views of the adjacent <br /> . residence. <br /> B. The City has received written confirination that the adjacent residents at <br /> the east and west side of the property have no problem with the proposed <br /> improvement and encourage the Council to approve applicant's deck. <br /> C. 3' upper level walkway deck does not provide adequate room for an <br /> outdoor dining area adjacent to upper level kitchen/ dining/living room <br /> • patio doors. <br /> D. The proposed improvement will result in a reduction of 0.6% hardcover <br /> within the 75-250' setback area. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely afFect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> , by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> � � � , <br /> • Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.