My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road North
>
820 Brown Road North
>
Land Use
>
78-317, SUBD
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2026 12:46:31 PM
Creation date
4/9/2026 12:33:45 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 13, 1978 - PAGE 6 <br />3. location of all existing structures FARM AT LONG LAKE <br />4. location of proposed fences on wetlands 820 N. Brown Rd. <br />Variance <br />Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). The motion passed. #358 <br />Coimnissioner Hannah stated he felt they should keep in mind <br />the safety aspect plus the developer's intent, and also <br />provide the best road width that will also be safe and <br />keep the country atmosphere. <br />Jim Olson stated the minivuum that could be approved is <br />20 ft., but they would like to see about 24 ft. with <br />emphasis on the base more so than the bituminous sur- <br />face. <br />The Commission discussed roads and how the City could take <br />over the private road and pay for costs of maintenance. <br />Hurr felt fencing the wetlands was against the Ordin- <br />ance and suggested asking the City Attorney for his <br />recommendation. <br />Tim Adams asked if the Planning Commission should be in- <br />volved in designing private roads. Hannah stated the <br />Commission is not trying to design, but are only trying <br />to ensure safety. Hassel stated if the City Engineer <br />recommends 20 ft. and if the Cl mission is told by the <br />developer this is a hardship. . .i if it is determined <br />a 10 ft. strip is not safe, then the Commission must <br />address this problem. <br />Jim Olson recommended there should be evidence that each <br />lot could support a satisfactory septic system and ad- <br />vised the Commission to get this information before final <br />plat approval. <br />Hurr addressed riparian rights and asked if the City <br />Attorney had responded to Mr. Pflaum's March 7, 1978 letter <br />on this. The Zoning Administrator stated he has not re- <br />ceived this information yet. <br />The Planning Commission indicated they wanted this infor- <br />mation before the next meeting. <br />Hurr felt the pedestrian easement would be granting riparian <br />rights and if the Commission stipulates the allowed uses <br />of the lake access easements, this would be a change in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.