Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 13, 1978 - PAGE 5 <br />regulations state a minimum <br />code requires a minimum of 3 <br />structures are on lot lines <br />from the property line. <br />of 30 ft. side setback and State` FARM AT LONG 1�%KE <br />ft. Therefore, if the existing 820 N. Brcwn Rd. <br />the next property mist be 6 ft. Variance <br />#358 <br />The Planning Commission suggested tearing down the existing <br />buildings. Tim Adams stated this is a quaint 2-door barn <br />and he did not feel he wanted to tear down or move the ex- <br />isting barn. He stated they will keep the sheep on Lot 19. <br />Commissioner Hurr asked how many sheep he planned to keep <br />on Lot 19. Tim Adams replied only as many as are allowed <br />by Orono code. Chairwoman McDonald stated when approving <br />a new subdivision, the Commission is not in favor of grant- <br />ing variances. <br />The Planning Commission indicated they wanted to know the <br />exact location of the existing buildings. Tim Adams stated <br />these buildings are not on the lot lines, and that they <br />are at least 3 ft. from the lot lines. he Zoning Adminis- <br />trator indicated he wanted to see a survey which would <br />show the location of these existing structures. Jim <br />Olson suggested the survey show the exact location of <br />any and all the encroachments. <br />Hurr addressed the pasture and wetlands easements, and <br />that Mr. Adams indicated they abut. <br />Chairwoman McDonald stated there are many unanswered <br />questions at this point and suggested postponing action <br />until the questions were answered. Tim Adams replied <br />he wanted action tonight as to whether the request will <br />be denied or if it will be forwarded to the Council with <br />certain stipulations. He added that if it is denied he <br />wanted to know why. He also stated that this request <br />has been in process since October of 1977 and he has <br />been bending over backwards to get the subdivision through <br />and did not feel he should have to wait because the Com- <br />mission wan ted more tnformation. Chairwoman McDonald <br />stated she has felt rushed on this subdivision request <br />since it started. Hassel stated during the approval of <br />the preliminary plat the Planning Commission had been <br />rushed. <br />Hassel moved, Frahm seconded, a motion to table the re- <br />quest until the following items are resolved: <br />1. if private access easement between Lots 19 and <br />20 should be r-corded on the plat or be included <br />in the title <br />2. the private ro A width and erosion issued be <br />resolved <br />