My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3936
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3900 - 3999 (May 12, 1997 - November 10, 1997)
>
Resolution 3936
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:23 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 12:38:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
di. 0 <br /> /O O <br /> �jtCITY of ORONO <br /> toe. ti RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 91C:ESH0 NO. 3 9 3 6 <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 21, 1997 and <br /> recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variances and conditional use <br /> permit based upon the following unique findings and hardships: <br /> a. The zoning lot does not meet minimum lot area or lot width requirements. <br /> b. The topography of the lot drops 22'from the front yard to the lakeshore. <br /> c. The north side yard has a steep topography that slopes down to the lakeshore. <br /> d. The timber retaining wall was in a deteriorated condition and has been <br /> removed. Work has been stopped on replacement of the wall until the <br /> appropriate variances and conditional use permit are obtained. <br /> e. The amount of hardcover will be reduced. <br /> f. Previous variances were granted for hardcover on this lot. <br /> 4. The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and <br /> do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; <br /> and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council fmds that granting a conditional use permit to replace a retaining <br /> wall in the 0-75' lakeshore setback will not be detrimental to the health, safety or <br /> general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate <br /> surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will <br /> be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.