Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2092 <br />November 16, 1995 <br />Page2 <br />5. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C-2) -Oversized accessory structure -variances for 2100 s.f. <br />oversized accessory structure on proposed Lot 2. <br />a. Existing= 2100 s.f. <br />Oversized structure allowed footprint= 1200 s.f. <br />a. Required setback = 50' (rear lot line of Lot 2) <br />Existing = 29' <br />Variance= 21' or 42% <br />b. Setback variance for existing principal structure on proposed Lot 1 <br />Required for side setback on back lot = 45' <br />Existing = 40' <br />Variance = 5' or 11.11 % <br />c. Front/street setback variance for residence structure on proposed Lot 1 <br />Required = 7 5' <br />Existing= 30' <br />Variance = 45' or 60% <br />List of Exhibits <br />A -Application <br />B -PlatMap <br />C -Property Owners' List <br />D -DNR Letter 8/21/95 <br />E -Wetlands Map <br />F -Preliminary Plat <br />G -Staff Sketch/Required Setbacks for Back Lot/Front Lot <br />Discussion <br />Based on Planning Commission's directives to applicant at their August, 1995 meeting, applicant <br />has submitted a formal subdivision application proposing a back lot/front lot division of his <br />homestead parcel at 5.64 acres. Refer to Exhibit G, side and rear lot lines of the front lot, Lot 2, <br />must be changed to 50'. Side and street setback of the back lot must also be changed, the sides to <br />45' and the street setback to 75'. During the sketch plan review, applicant advised that the residence <br />structure and oversized accessory structure were to be moved from the property. The existing <br />structures do not meet required setbacks from the proposed division line. Applicant should advise <br />as to the status of the structures. If they are to be removed, there is no issue. If they are to remain, <br />will you grant setback variances? Based on the location of the barn in relation to the house, it would <br />be impossibk to gerrymander lot line in order to meet the required setback. Applicant should also <br />comment as to the status of the pool. How long should pool be allowed to remain without a <br />principal structure?