Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THY PLANNING CCMMISSION MEETING HLLD AUGUST 15, 1988 REBERS SUBDIVISION PROPOSAL CONTINUED potential homeowner would need to get their house plans approved by an archirectura 1 centro 1 committee. This would as Sure that •11 houses, whether built by Mr. Rebers or another developer, met rtain standards required for building in that development. Kelley asked whether the homeowner's association would be the enforcing body of the covenants, and what the penalties would be for the homeowner who violated any of the covenants. Mr. Pflaum st.ted that the immediate homeowner was the most concerned party. They would nctify the adjacent homeowner or builder of any potential v )lation. The homeowner has tli right of injunctive relief, which would interfere with hi 'ding and financing. The second level of enforcement would be City of Orono, which would have separate, legal authority Lc enforce the provisions set forth there in the contract entered into with the developer. Mr. Kelley asked about a specific situation whe-e an adjacent neighbor would have no objections to a homeowner adding a tennis court outside the buildi - pad. Mr. Pflaum replied that the City should not issue a perm cor the tennis court because it would violate the provisions of the contract. Kelley asked about the individual who would cut down a tree within the protective easement location. Mr. Pflaum stated that. the individual would be in violation of the covenants and would be breaking the contract with the homeowner's association and the City. Generally the red flag would come from a neica,hor who would report toe it dent. The City could then der the violator '-o cease a.... desist. Cohen asked if it would be possible to mark the trees that are not to be removed. Pflaum answered affirmatively. Mr. Jarvis stated that in lieu of marking each tree, a snow fence or taping would be done to mark the protective area. Kelley stated that there were some bi13 i,sues involved w;th *his pro jec*_. He wanted ' o get the ela.,,-.inq commission's yeedba ck 00-1 L e col lowing key isc, Continuation of Pine lii1le Lane: +on thought thi ,Ian worked very nicely. Ring rya Woo'Ss ig :c-si.cally the same, axcept for the extension of Pine Ridge Lane. lie thought the plan would innt require through traffic. Bellow was not absolutely positive t it pin* RiJSe would need to be the connecting road. Kelley would he satisfied if they could find something that :uld work with the 3.3 &(.ues or the total 45 with,-)ut connection to Pine Ridge, he would not object t deadending Pine Ridge, and having the association to the west vacated and divided up amongst the property owners to tie west. Cohen d'sasreed wit! Kelley aad was e-r--cdrn#d about entering or exiting the locat' n should th, cniy •e be blockee due to an accident or ether reason. Brrn+n was it in favor of .,onnecting Pine Ridge, bur, liked the aspect of keeping the parcel separate. Moob felt that the connection was not Necessary, but wanted to have a loop. In summary, the Planning Cosy 1, ton felt that connection with Pine Ridge would 21