Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNOL <br />l\.1EETING HELD ON SEPTE1\1DER 11, 1995 <br />(#7 -#2048 James & Joann Jundt -Continued) <br />It was noted that this is the sixth application by the applicants. <br />Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3599. Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />(#8) #2050 WILLIAI\1 TOLES, 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE -VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION #3600 <br />The applicant was not present but was represented by the realtor for the property.· · <br />Gaffron reported that the application is for hardcover and average lakeshore setback <br />variances. The property was subject to a variance application in 1988. The current··· <br />hardcover c-alculations match that which were appro_yed in 1988. The proposed, pdol <br />would be 115' from the shoreline. The average lak.eshore setback is defined by the house <br />to the northeast, and the house on the west, which is set back. Gaffron said there would <br />be no impact on these neighboring homes. <br />The hardcover calculations shows 33.1% existing in the 75-250' zone, where 25% is <br />allowed, and is proposed at 32.6%. The reduction in hardcover will be acquired through <br />the removal of 1390 s.f oflandscape fabric and plastic and 400 s.f of concrete and wood <br />patio. <br />The pool was looked at as structure. The Planning Commission recommended approval <br />of the application with reductions as noted in hardcover. The applicant was asked to <br />reduce more hardcover if this was possible. <br />Hurr said she saw no problem with the average lak:eshore setback but saw no hardship to <br />add to the structural hardcover. Hurr asked ifthere was anywhere to reduce the amount <br />of hardcover. Gaffron said any further removal would affect the house or driveway. <br />It was noted that this application was for a hardcover variance only, not a structural <br />coverage variance. The structural coverage is at 11 % with the proposed pool. Gaffi-on <br />said the review of hardcover and structure was made due to the issue of non-structural <br />versus structural hardcover issue with landscape beds and plastic underlayment. <br />Hurr asked for clarification of the reduction of non-structural and decking by 400'. <br />Gaffron said the reduction is from a patio 2' above grade. The 400 s.f in patio would be <br />in exchange for the 1500 s.f pool. There is a net reduction in non-structural hardcover <br />of 137 s.f. with the removal of 1390 s.f of plastic and fabric. <br />5