#895 1260_1240 Bracketts Project Packet

Home Browse Search

To: PI -inning Commission Members From: Jeanne r,. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: April 10, 1985 Sukject: #895 Thomas Crosby Sr., 1240-1260 Brackett's Point Road Subdivision - Class I ionirg District - LR-lA Application - Subdivision; Class 7 - metes and bounds division of a )t 1 i.ne rearrangeme•- Second Review by Pli.tning Com lssiu Tabled at the 3/19/85 meeting Pertinent ordinances Section 10.f3, Subdivision 6 (C) Section 11.03, Definition Subdivision (65) List of Euhibits Exhibit A - Application & Transmittal Letter Exhibit B - Property Owners List an. l plat Map Exhibit C - Plat Map - Pattern of Ownership Exhibit D1, D2, D3 - Plat Maps With Proposed Realignment Exhibit E - Pillsbury Lot - Sketc:h Plan - Staff Sketch Exhibit F - Drainfield Site Locations, Pillsbury Lot Exhibit G - Pre'!vinary Survey The anplicaitt seeks not only a realigment or division of Parcel C (see Exhibit C) but approval for the transfer or separation of Parcel B, rerer to the same exhibit, from the commonly owned parcels of Mrs. Eleanor Lawler Pillsbury, Parcels A, C & D that total approximately 2.01 acres it area. Per Section 10.03, Subdivision n W, Council approval is required when that separation results in a bu., dable site that does not satisfy current zoning standards. The new dividing lot line has been staked for your inspection. I have once again discussed the issue of the flood plain involvment at the proposed building locat ior, with John Pi 1 1 sbury. He wants nE to reassure the Planninq Commission that the proposed division will not affect :iis choice of building location. Mr. & Mrs. Pillsbury met with me earlier this year ane we discussed the buildability -)f the i acre site and the possibility of 0ividinq off a portion of the property to be combined with his brother-in-law's substandard lot. I ad•.ised the Pillsbury's to select the site for the proposed 'ding and t( have the r- .-essary septic tests made to assure a p ry and alto-rnate site. i reviewed the flood plain maps with them _l advised th,=t the survey should also dQsignate the flood plain area. We met or-e again to r^-r ew the survey. The bui ldinq location was noted an(: I have sketcnec, in the approximate location of the proposed residence on a survey (see Fxhibi• E). The pret�rred house location is indeed in- volved with the outer or fringe portions of the flood plain - the future owners were made aware of that earlier this year. They have been ad,:,ised that the DNR must review all alterati,.ns of a designated flood plain and that the ('ity wi 11 reouire that the Elevation of the first "Living Level" t:c- I foot above the, flood plain elevation of 931.5.