Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOLER 16, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE 11466-KOKESH CONTINUED <br />Gaffron said that in order to construct the 14' x 16' porch a <br />front setback variance will be required and a side setback <br />variance will be necessary fcr the construction of the deck. <br />Ms. Roberta Schmidt, 3980 Watertown Road, said that Mr. <br />Kokesh's house was in a state of disrepair when he purchased it. <br />Since that time, he has greatly improved the house and she felt <br />that the porch would be a nice addition. <br />There wern no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter an(; the public hearing was closed. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown inquired as to the owner of the <br />property to the north: <br />Chairman Kelley answered that the property was owned by Mr. <br />Kokesh's father and was pasture area. <br />Planning Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Kokesh if he had <br />considered purchasing 'and from his father? <br />Mr. Kokesh respoi.,.ed that it was not financially possible at <br />this time. He said that the house was very small and would <br />probably be torn down at such time that he purchased land from <br />his father. <br />It was moved by Planning Cc mmissioner Bellows, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Brown, Lo recommend approval of the <br />front and side setback variances to construct a porch and open <br />deck. Chairman Kelley questioned whE'_her Bellows wished to <br />include in her motion a condition disallowing enclosure of the <br />deck at a future time. Bellows amended her motion to include <br />that approval is conditioned upon the deck remaining a deck only <br />and may not be improved at any time in the future, Brown <br />seconded. Motion, Aves=7, Nays=O, Moticn passed. <br />11468 GEORGE 1PILLSBURY <br />.1300 BRACKETT'S POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:25 P.M. TO 8:40 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Putlication and Certific3`e cf Mailinq were <br />duly noted. <br />Mr. Thomas Meyer and Mr. herb Na lciwir. were present <br />representing the applicants. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated <br />that the Pillsburys wished to put a greenhouse addition c;n their <br />existing residence located less than 75' from the lake. Gaffron <br />said at the existing hi.rdcover located within the 0-75' setback <br />zone would increa!�e ro 7.6%. Gaffron further explained that the <br />applicants were al proposing to put some kind of drai., the in <br />the 0-75' setback ,at would lead back to the 71-250' zone '-o a <br />wet well. <br />1c <br />