Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File 41216 <br />October 13, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />The applicant wants to dredge the pond so that there is standing water <br />at all times. The wetland is predominately dry with cattails - the <br />alteration involves 25% of the pond area. Per the Engineer's report, <br />Exhibit E, the dredging will slightly reduce the assimulative capacity of <br />the marsh. The prcdosed depth will reduce alge growth and pond odors. The <br />Engineer sees no long term adverse effects on Lake Minnetonka as a result <br />of this project because of the minimal scope of the project. The project <br />will result in increase sedimentation capacity and wildlife habitat. <br />Prior to making a recommendation on this application, Planning <br />Commission should consider the necessary findings that must be made prior <br />to making your recommendation whether it be for denial or approval - <br />Section 1 %55, Subdivision 25 (A), Items 1-7. <br />If approved your conditions should include the following: <br />1. Applicant to provide silt fencing near the pond outlet. <br />2. Hauling cannot take place on week -ends and may only be conducted <br />Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. City must be advised in <br />writing if it is necessary to haul on Saturdays. <br />3. The liability issue should be r^_viewed by applicant since the <br />creation of a 12 feet deep pond wi 1 1 create a potential hazard. <br />Additional Cos nts and Planninq Co fission Recoâ– stendation - <br />October 30, 1987 <br />The Planning Commission questioned the classification of a pond of <br />this size as a protected wetland. Staff advised that cattails or <br />vegetptirn did provide assimulative treatment of run-off to the pond <br />(serving 4+ acre watershed). Currently, the elevation of the culvert to <br />the east side of the pond al lows lake water to f low into pond when lake <br />reaches an elevation of 929+. The raising of the culvert and the increased <br />depth of the pond will allow greater retention for run-off from the <br />watershed and the untouched vegetation (751 of pond area) will still <br />provide adequate treatment for this sized watershed. <br />Planning Commission approved of the dredging application but <br />questioned staff's concern for the liability of the application with a pond <br />now at a 12 feet depth. Planning Commission felt that this is the same <br />issue for the owner who installs a pool. The insurance carrier of the <br />owner shall advise applicant of his liability if any. <br />The enclosed resolution has been drafted per Planning Commission <br />recommendation. <br />