My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1629 Bohns Point Road - 17-117-23-11-0005
>
Land Use
>
84-881, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2026 10:31:16 AM
Creation date
3/10/2026 10:29:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 4 <br />#783 I.D. CAPLES <br />4798 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #1721* <br />C881--1Q1LLIAM KRUT7.IC1 <br />1629 BOHN'S POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm <br />seconded to approve Resolution #1271, A Resolution <br />,,r.tnting A Variance. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Applicant William Krutzig was present. Assistant <br />'Aoniny Administrator ^,affron stated this property <br />w-)uld require a variance or at least some additional <br />review because of the proposed hardcover and Mr. <br />Krutzig would like to present some alternatives to <br />hardcover. We have a report from his engineer, Mr. <br />Mark Gronberg, that discos.i•.s slat spacing of decks <br />and underlying material. I have asked the City <br />nyineer Glenn Cook to review this material. <br />Cook stated the proposal to place a sand bed under <br />the ci•-,ck to absorb the runoff is a good idea if you <br />look at it from a hydraulic point of view. From the <br />City's point of view ,we h.t a policing problem, we <br />have no way of knowing at some point in time of <br />changes that could by .nadtt by future own--�rs of the <br />property. Frahm stated he aould not be in favor of <br />policing decks. <br />.. ;,Jams st;f ted we should leave the ordinances the <br />way they are, discouraging decks beyond the allowed <br />hardcover and not allowing decks within the 0-75 foot <br />setback. When a speci,ji r_Qn«,, along where <br />the topl. i-3-it hay; presented a goad plan for runoff <br />absorption <ind *;h,?re the applicant has a hardship on <br />th-, lot we would allow some additional decking or <br />some additional treated hardcover on a variance <br />ba s i :; . <br />?r)•iing Administrator Mabusth sugyestea listing this <br />in the resolution l i m i t i n;3 the deck to the size or <br />area you would allow for that decking since the <br />resolution is file) in t:ht chain of title. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated the <br />property would be allowed a minimal garaye apron and <br />a 10 or 12 foot driveway veway getting out to the access <br />road. Krutzig is pronosing a new proluct, it is a <br />rock ayyre(jatc: with an epoxy material that will hold <br />them toclether. Gaffron showed samples of this <br />hr.ocluc:t to the Council. This produrt has not bee, <br />used without a solid bast' in a winter climate art <br />th,r rt-coimnF�n.IoLion 18 to il-;- 1�: ),.I 9 of asphalt <br />or concretf:. In lieu of th.tt to mike it a none <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.