Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OI•' THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IiELD MARCH 30, 1987 <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />#1096 J. VOGT/M. HILBELINK* <br />95/175 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />FINAL STIRDIV I SION <br />RESOLUTION 42152 <br />It was moved by Councilmembez Sime, seconded by <br />Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Pesolution 42152 <br />approving the Plat of Peterman Second Addition. Motion, <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN #2 <br />Mayor Sreby of Long Lake was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Rprnhardson recommended that formal <br />action on the Comprehensive Plan 02 be tabled until the <br />April 27, 1987 meeting as requested by Mr. P.ebers, owner <br />of Area 4. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained this_ the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment being proposed is the <br />result of a year long study of the Highway 12 Corridor. <br />Once the Council has given preliminary approval, the <br />plan is sent to the Metropolitan Council for approval <br />and also sent to the affected jurisdictions for their <br />commentb. After Metro Council approval, it would be <br />brought back to the City Council for final adoption and <br />implementation. <br />City Administrator Bez,.iiardson explained the overall <br />comprehensive plan objectives were as follows: <br />1. Land use - using Orono's general philosophy of <br />protecting Lake Minnetonka (runoff etc.). <br />2. Transportation - dealing with Highway 12, <br />transportation problems through and across corridor. <br />3. Environmental Protection - keeping major <br />environmental features intact and if possible <br />enhancing them. <br />4. Public Service Provision - that any improvements <br />be able to pay for themselves, noting it is not the <br />intent of this change to generate any tax base. <br />Gener,! alternatives considered in this study as <br />follows: <br />1. Leave as status quo. <br />2. nvelop possible cn-site septic uses that were <br />not not typical single family home uses. <br />3. Possible ciei�elopment beyond the existing systems <br />capacity, particularly transportation, sewer 6 water <br />in the area. <br />4. Not to go beyond the existing systems, remain <br />.iithin the exist.inq capacity. <br />5 . Combi nc . of all alternatives 1-4. <br />vo reviewod • :mplt imentation process and performance <br />It <br />