Laserfiche WebLink
Highway 12 past the year 2000. At the meeting it was requested that <br />in order to have a more informed discussion on the matter, that MnDot <br />indicate what the maximum design they could do within the existing <br />corridor together with indicating what could or would be a possible <br />corridor routing for a four (4) lane, should it be outside the <br />existing corridor. :t was indicated that this was not to be an <br />endorsement of any particular idea, but only attempting to get <br />information regarding the alternatives. While this may have some <br />eventual impact on the i,ighway 12 corridor it is still in the <br />preliminary stages. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It is recommended that; <br />A. Following presentation of information on the items the Council discuss <br />area by area and identifying any additional information or issues they <br />desire addressed regard'.,? this Comprehensive Plan Amendment 42. <br />B. Council ta:.. further consideration of the Comprehensive Plan for two <br />weeks in light of annexation request together with allowing the opportunity <br />to develop other information or issues the Council desires staff to <br />address. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , the Council having further <br />discussed the matter table the issue unties at least the May 11, 1987 <br />meeting for cons deration of any additional information together with the <br />most recently pr^stnted information. Ayes _, Nays <br />