04-27-1987 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

acre rural with one (1) acre residential property between that and the commercial area. While there is no specific re -zoning request in front of you, it is appropriate to look at the intensity of possible development in this area prior to approval of the comprehensive plan amendm,-.it. As noted in Attachment 8, the residences in t vicinity of this property however, have a signed a petition indicating that they desire the two (2) acre desity be maintained throughout the property. It becomes an issue of the point at which the property is transitioned back from a currently zoned commercial property back to the two (2) acre residential. standard. B. Northeast -Corner - Area #3. While discussed last time, there may be persons in the audience who want to further discuss the inclusion of the northeast corner of Area #3 within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area Line on development issues of feasibility and economics. C. Annexation. As m-ntioned in the introduction and as noted in Attachment A, the City of Long Lake has extended their willingness togeth?r with their rational for annexing certain properties within the corridor on the north side of Highway 12. While Orono may not share the same perspective on whether annexation is appropriate or on the historical development of the area, if Long Lake desires to annex, it is appropriate that it be discussed in a cooperative and constructive manner. In addition to annexation of properties within the corridor, they also desire to annex their sewer pond property that they own within the City of Orono. As you may recall, the sewer pond property was originally discussed regarding a possible change of zoning of the property from the current two (2) acre residential to a more incense sew,�,red development about 2-3 years ago to be of a density similar to Long Lake's development on the west side of Grono Orchard Road. Representatives from the Long Lake Council will be available to make a presentation of their request together with answering any questions that Council .ay have. D. Highway 12-T2sk Force. The !lighway 12 Task Force group of Willmar, made a presentation to representatives of tong Lake, Maple Plain, Independence, and Orono at a meeting held April 2p, 1987. Long Lake and Independence have presently gone on record supporting the Task Force desire to upgrade 'iighway 12, wni le Maple P1 in and Orono ha.re been in opposition tc it :and have lnd',-ated their Jesirr to look at other options for on(lorsing a particular plan. For a portion of Highway 12 betwr-n Wayzata and oe lino, the Task Force has indicated that they desire "open acr.«�ss" fr.➢ar (4) lane but indicated not` -g regarding routing or any other �pc-c i f ics. Represe'n at i ves from f c,t in attendance inii(73—ed a foir (4) ' in- is sompwhit ]ustif: d a* I level is 1 ?w :17, to :1,(1�1�1 !_ri".^ pf� r lay. Tn.e current 1',000 to 19,1101 .rips p-,T j_{'y witi;ir➢ ♦ f' ri,i')r wttjl .F (XpP �'i�1C?t; ?f goin'.1 to u p w .a r l s t (:> �, , :1 ;1 it t r { I) . �,,' + ..1. tir ' ! p r o t a !'t : y ;'a .l 1 i f i° for a four 14) iane. ^r i �f''"Jt' !; ]' 7 `7!"F'''lr }` �!t!.tF+n !tie i'tention of vir 1r'ruP: Mnitn► 'j i !' 1i. ♦ •+r _ J.1h ,i iI i it'WJ1 i C➢,y .a a; !f.'1Gr 4j di�ttri: t!, in t :'., 1' 1r; l ,. 1 in' ,:;.„1L-A' n i-nr:-3'.r'...i t ic,n up r.i;jF, f}t`t':r,+ ^ K f In '1 ♦.1(#' ! i i 1 r1('� C now r I7U T. ♦ ➢T' J i' 1 �r. s j , ➢ f ., T r`