04-27-1987 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CITIZENS ADVISORY CO MEETING SUMMARY 1 AM 2 0� March 24, 1967 and March 30, 1967 (``� 99 Attendance: George Eckblad Arlene Gwen Wilderinuth Barbdra Jensen Julie Davis Aria Karl Mark Hendrickson -staff tarry Blackst.i,_ itaff Guests: David Hagen -City of Robbinsddl Michael Bjerksett-':ational Handicap Housing Institute Inc., Rubbinsaale Robert Arthur, Hennepin Economic Resource Orgar,iration Ben Witnant-Senior Connnunity Services Don Ulrick-Westonka Community Services Sandy Werts-City of Eden Prairie Jeannine Dunn -City of New Hope Patricia Murphy -Union City Mission Sigrid Vugel-City of Champlin Gail Lippert -City of Hanover Shirley Hendrickson -Hennepin County Community Resources Uaycare Bud Setzler-City of Osseo Gene Hakanson-City of Ossee Bill Chapman -City of Osseo Tom Campbell -City of Maple Grove Al 'ladsen-City of Maple Grove Prior to the project presentations, staff reviewed with the Committee the prograaa priority areas established by the Hennepin County board of Commis- sioners. Those priority areas being housing, economic development, and puolic facilities. To assist the Committee, staff provided a spreadsheet which indicated the distr;but,on of funding requests between project category and the identifiea priority areas. The Committee hEard brief preseni_-:.iu►is concerning 1.4 of 27 funding requests. Following completion of the presentations the Committee reccs;ed the •_eting to 7 p.m., March 30, 1987, at which time it would review all of the funding requests and prepare a funding recommendation for submission to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. On MdrCh 30, 087, the ""ommittee reconvened to prepare its eecoms+endation for reallocation of 5551,'35 in the Countywide Discretionary Account. Staff distributed to the Committee letters from the city of Os,ec and HERO provid- ing additiunal information on their respective funding requests. The Committee in devnlopinq the funding recommendaticn followed a two-step revie,v/dicussion process. The initial step in the process was to review, without .onsileratian of the project budget, ghat the project was to accoa<- plish, who was to benefit from the project, and liow the project related to one of the throe program priority areas. Based upon consensus agreement, the Lu mitteo a,Pd ',.►+is first >tep to pare d.n+n the list of funding re<jursts.