My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1700 Bohns Point Road - 16-117-23-22-0003
>
Land Use
>
16-3814, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2026 11:23:29 AM
Creation date
3/5/2026 11:22:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO..£LANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 21, 2016 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />6. #16-3814 ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP ON BEHALF OF PETER AND MELISSA <br />SANTRACH, 1700 BOHNS POINT ROAD, VARIANCE, 7:24 P.M. -7:52 P.M. <br />Peter and Melissa Santrach, Applicants, were present. <br />Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances in order to <br />construct a new residence on the property located at the very south end of Bohns Point. The property is <br />fairly small compared to other properties in Bohns Point and consists of two-thirds of an acre in a one- <br />acre zone. The new residence would be larger than what currently exists while the driveway would be <br />made smaller. Due to the current narrow configuration of the driveway, it is difficult for cars to tum <br />around. <br />A small portion of the existing house is located 65 feet from the lake, while the entire new house is <br />proposed to meet the required 75-foot lake setback. However, because the adjacent property to the south <br />is vacant, the required average lakeshore setback is defined by the setback from the lake of the adjacent <br />house to the north, which is 115 feet from the lake. <br />The majority of the properties along the east side of Bohns Point are much deeper than the applicants ' <br />property and, as a result, the neighboring homes are set back at least 100 feet or more from the lake. <br />Absent a variance to the 115 foot setback, the applicants' property will have a buildable envelope of 25 to <br />40 feet in depth and 120 feet in width, potentially resulting in a long, narrow home stretching from side <br />lot line to side lot line and likely not in character with the neighborhood. Staff feels the average lakeshore <br />setback variance is reasonable given the building envelope. <br />Gaffron noted the deck down by the lake as well as a patio will remain. <br />In addition, the applicants are requesting a variance to allow 27 .2 percent hardcover where only 25 <br />percent is normally allowed. Existing hardcover on the site is 29.0 percent. The property is located in <br />Tier 1. The proposed hardcover on the property consists primarily of the house and driveway, with <br />sidewalks, steps and patios accounting for the remainder. The proposed house footprint is right at the 15 <br />percent structural coverage limit. The proposed hardcover is approximately 600 square feet over the 25 <br />percent limit. This amount is approximately equal to the area of the portion of driveway north of the <br />garage apron, which provides for the loop access and entry sidewalk. Gaffron stated it becomes a <br />question of how much house the applicants should be allowed to have versus the driveway and the <br />Planning Commission should consider whether further reductions in hardcover should be made. <br />Letters have been received from both adjacent property owners in support of the variance requests. <br />Gaffron stated if the Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met and the <br />variances are justified, then a recommendation for approval may be in order. <br />The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br />Peter Santrach, Applicant, stated as Staff has pointed out, they would like to construct a new home on this <br />small lot. Santrach indicated they have encountered some difficulty in designing a home that will fit on <br />the lot as well as provide some off-street parking. Santach noted this property is accessed through the <br />easement, which is shared by two other properties. There is no off-street parking on the easement. In <br />addition , the road access is fairly narrow and does not really allow for any off-street parking. Granting <br />Page 10 of 21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.