Laserfiche WebLink
To: Planning Commission Members <br />From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />Date: January 16, 1986 <br />Subject: #1004 William Ulrich, 1535 & 1595 Bohn's Point Road - <br />Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement <br />Zoning District - LR-lB <br />Area - 7.06 Acres (.48 Acres Wet) <br />Pt-rtinent Ordinances <br />10.55, Subdivision 15 A (2) & (3) minimum lot area require- <br />ments for sewered areas containing wetlands/flood fringe <br />areas <br />10.22, Subdivision 1 - hardcover standards <br />10.24, Subdivision 3 - conditional use permit standards for <br />guest house use <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Exhibit E - <br />Exhibit F - <br />Application <br />Property Owners List <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />Council Minutes 10/14/31 <br />Lot Line Rearrangement <br />Hardcover Survey For Parcel <br />9/21/81 <br />B <br />Mr. Ulrich proposes a lot line rearrangement of his <br />residential properties at 1.535 & 1595 Bohn's Point Road totaling <br />7.06 acres in area. As shown 1535 would contain 4.97 acres in <br />area and 1595 at 2.67 acres (.48 acres of wetlands). <br />Each parcel appears to satisfy the standards of the LR-lB <br />zoning district. The area standard has been satisfied for Parcel <br />B with 2 legal residential units. Staff has to question how we <br />are to satisfy the required width standard of 140 feet. <br />The guest house, approved in 1981 for a previous nwner, is <br />located 30 feet from the principal structure. A division line <br />could never be drawn between the quest house and principal <br />structure to satisfy both the 140 feet lot width standarO and the <br />side setback standard of 10 feet. Review Exhibit E. ,f a lot <br />line was drawn 10 feet from the principal structure, the guest <br />house lot would measure 130 feet maximum width. <br />In recent conditional use permit reviews dealing with quest <br />house structures, lot width standards, in relation to future <br />division lines, were considered i.e. the Winton application. If <br />you review the enclosed minutes that deal with the Blohorn appli- <br />cation you will note that. approval was based on the findinq that <br />there was adequate lot width to satisfy the second unit. <br />