Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1040 June 12, 1986 Page 2 of 2 The applicant has claimed that the wall will be constructed in the same manner as the first installation. Plans have not been submitted to confirm this nor, as the City Enginner's report confirms, has the plan submitted with application been certified correctly by the licensed engineer. This must be corrected before the City can issue a building permit for construction of sea wall. The initial installation provided for earthern tone aluminum wall sections (each section 9" wide). The wall extends approximately 20" above the ordinary high water mark and would stand 8' high (6 1/3 feet of the wall would be under water and lake bed). As in the first review, the City will not approve any walkway along the edg, of the sea wall that would involve hard- cover within the 0-75' setback area. Staff recommends approval of the extension of the sea wall tut will not schedule the application for final approval by Council until the applicant's engineer certifies in writing t.)3t specifications for wall are the same as approved with initial installation and that the plan meets standard design criteria and not that "it appears to do so". Resolution 1522 has been enclosed for your consideration and may be used in drafting the necessary findings for granting approval of current application. Staff would suggest that this would be an appropriate time to remind applicant that he is limited to mooring 4 boats (boats in excess of 16 feet) at his residential dock(s). Additional Comments and Planning Co■s:ission Recces endation: The applicant's engineer has recertified the plans for the sea wall as required by our City Engineer. Planning Commission recommended approval of the extension of the sea wall along the lagoon shoreline based on the findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed resole*ion.